Cesar thinks so:
Um. In case you haven’t noticed, he’s full of crap here.
Cesar has Chanticleer’s fallacy– big time. Chanticleer was a rooster who appears in Medieval English folklore. (He makes an appearance in the Canterbury Tales, if my memory serves.)
In one of the stories about him, Chanticleer is dead certain that his crowing makes the sun rise. He does not realize that the two events are merely correlated, and he assumes that correlation is equal to causation.
This is exactly what Cesar is doing here. He is assuming that because dogs carry their tails aloft while walking that he can just raise the tail of a dog and it won’t be nervous or insecure.
He’s literally telling us that the tail wags dog here.
And yet still a he’s a great dog expert.
I’m not a dog expert at all. I don’t claim to be.
But this is such nonsense.
I think he literally made this up on the spot.
Which is nice.
But please don’t assume that it’s anything like reality.
Otherwise, you’re talking advice from the Chanticleer of dog trainers, excuse me– “dog rehabilitators.”
Here’s a hint: the brain controls what the dog feels. The tail is merely an outward expression of emotions that originate in the brain.
And yes, I’m aware that actions, like licking, can cause the dog to release endorphins and that will make them feel better.
But I’ve never seen a single study that suggests that putting a dog’s tail in a position automatically make them feel that way.
I can’t buy this, as kooky as it sounds.