The Retriever, Dog, & Wildlife Blog

Posted in Absolute Piffle, creationism | Tagged Kent Hovind | 5 Comments

5 Responses

1. on June 13, 2012 at 10:04 pm | Reply DesertWindHounds

   Yeah, but did he spend the night at a Holiday Inn Express?

   
   
2. on July 11, 2012 at 11:21 pm | Reply richard

   If we look at evolution again why do we assume that apes had a purpose to evolve from apes to humans along with a split of family apes that have been selected in nature? If we assume this process in evolution we can clearly view that fossils and the age factor is unnecessary to determine which family of humans are categorized. If we look at the process of evolution of chimpanzees wouldn’t we assume that chimps would evolve to 100 % intelligent as of humans, though we still see that there is a factor of 2% difference between each other? We can state that apes did not evolve to become as intelligent as humans, though they took a different path inside their family three. We should also study if that all apes today have existed with extinct apes and understand if modern apes evolved from other types of apes. My estimation is that a first kind naturally selected in nature producing many types and that some of them went extinct when they were situated into an environment that changed them over time. This new habitation should have taken the time needed for that specie to evolve into a new form and not reproduce its original complexity.

   
   
3. on July 11, 2012 at 11:26 pm | Reply richard

   while this new formation took place I can clearly see why that ape is not able to mate with others, it does not share enough traits in dna or information to interbreed with others. While it as lost its original data that it will not reproduce its original kind and lost the information to change back to its original kind.

   
   
4. on July 11, 2012 at 11:27 pm | Reply richard

   I do agree that Darwin as been able to identify gaps between animals that bring sense why animals reproduce and in fact bring complex dna to their own kind. This describes that organisms, plants and bacteria came from various kinds of their family tree and evolved (selecting from nature) from that particular kind to a whole new branch of species. I do disagree that animals came from one long ago specie, this tells us in fact that humans can evolve into insects or vice versa. I believe that there was a creator who created living organisms and plants with their own complex dna, though an animal able to turn into a whole different known specie is impossible. I believe that various kinds of fathers where created and by chance given the ability to natural select, cross breed, and mutate with their own kind and evolve the tree of life of species (branches of families).

   
   
   • on July 11, 2012 at 11:42 pm | Reply retrieverman

     I think you misunderstand evolution. It has no direction or purpose. There is only descent from a common ancestor and natural selection.

     There was no guarantee that humans would evolve as we are or that any species on earth would evolve as it is.

     And all the species on earth right now are evolving. All living things are transitional forms from one generation to the next.

     
     

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of follow-up comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.