• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Patreon
  • Premium Membership
  • Services

Natural History

by Scottie Westfall

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Bigfoot in Northeast Ohio?
What exactly do we know about Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in dogs? »

Jackal is a meaningless term

August 23, 2012 by SWestfall3

A side-striped jackal (Canis adustus), the jackal no one talks about.

We’ve always called the smaller wild dogs in the genus Canis jackals.

Historically, there were four species of jackal:  the golden (Canis aureus), the black-backed (Canis mesomelas), the side-striped (Canis adustus), and the Simien (Canis simensis).

Some authorities considered they coyote (Canis latrans) to be a jackal, usually called “the American jackal.”

At one time, they were all placed in the genus Thous.

This, of course, assumed that these animals were all closely related to each other.

However, as we’ve looked at DNA analysis, the relationship between jackals shows that the term “jackal” is actually quite meaningless.

In 1994, an mtDNA study revealed that the Simien jackal had certain mtDNA sequences that were more similar to wolves than other jackals. It was thought to be a relict population of primitive wolves that came into Africa during the Pleistocene.

And from that time forth, the English name of this species was change to “Ethiopian wolf.”  I don’t call it anything else.

However, as more work was performed on jackals, certain facts became evident.

Initial studies of black-backed, side-striped, and golden jackal mtDNA revealed that black-backs in East Africa had huge variances in their mtDNA. Golden jackals had mtDNA that was most similar to coyotes and wolves, while black backs and side-stripes were more similar to each other.

And then the phylogeny of the dog family was drawn from a high-quality sequencing of the dog genome revealed that golden jackals were much more closely related to coyotes and the wolf and domestic dog species than the Ethiopian wolf was. We still call them Ethiopian wolves, even though golden jackals are more closely related to actual wolves than those animals are.

The other issue revealed through this research was that Canis, as it is traditionally classified, is a paraphyletic genus. Modern taxonomy is generally concerned with classifying animals according clades. Clades are, by definition monophyletic. That is, they contain all the animals that descend from a particular lineage.

The dog genome research revealed that two species that are never traditionally classified as being part of Canis, the African wild (Lycaon pictus) and the dhole (Cuon alpinus), actually should be included there.  It turns out that black-backed and side-striped jackals are more distantly related to the rest of Canis than these two species are.

And if we classify Canis with all the jackals, the Ethiopian wolf, and  the wolf and dog species and leave out the dhole and African wild dog, we’ve created a paraphyletic genus that is not useful to modern taxonomy.

Some have suggested giving the two endemic African jackals their own genus.

And this would make Canis monophyletic without including the African wild dog and dhole.

However, the genus that would remain would include several species that are all chemically interfertile with each other (at least in theory). Species complexes exist throughout that part of the Canis, and delineating species is very difficult the species in this lineage.

Although Robert Wayne at UCLA has suggested that black-backed and side-striped jackals might be able to interbreed, no one has confirmed a hybrid between these two species. African wild dogs might be able to hybridize with dholes, but because they live on different continents and because they are both fairly endangered, no one has attempted to cross them. (There are persistent rumors that dholes can cross with domestic dogs. One dog breed, the Bangkaew dog from Thailand, is said to have derived from a dog/dhole cross. However, I don’t believe this claim has ever been tested through DNA analysis.)

All this research has revealed that how we have traditionally thought about the dog family is probably wrong.

The golden jackal is actually a primitive offshoot of the wolf lineage, just as the coyote in the New World is. The Ethiopian wolf is an even more primitive offshoot.

The two endemic African jackals are the two oldest living species in the Canis lineage. They are even more distinct from this lineage than dholes and African wild dogs are.

We do not have a good replacement word for jackal.

I’ve suggested that we call golden jackals “Old World coyotes” almost as a joke.

But I don’t have a good name for either of the two remaining jackal.

Because black-backed jackals are so scrappy, I’ve even suggested that we call them “wild Jack Russells.”

Whatever we call them, the term jackal, if it’s used to reflect close relationships between species, is utterly meaningless.

With the exception of the two found only Africa, it doesn’t refer to any animals that have a close relationship with each other.

It’s just a term we use for smaller wild dogs that are in some way related to wolves.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Taxonomy, wild dogs | Tagged black-backed jackal, Canis, Ethiopian wolf, golden jackal, Jackal, side-striped jackal, Simien jackal | 9 Comments

9 Responses

  1. on August 24, 2012 at 4:50 am Shah

    I think the term jackal should only apply to Canis aureus, as it is for this species that the name was invented in the first place. As for the other two species, why not use an indigenous name? I’m sick of canid species being named after others, with the addition of some paultry adjective.


  2. on August 24, 2012 at 11:18 am Kathy K

    Nothing in the Old World should ever be called “Coyote” or any variation on “Coyote”. The similarity between these canids is a matter of convergence; they are not related. People who get into this kind of naming usually know they are referring to niches but others come along and think the animals are actually related.


    • on August 24, 2012 at 11:28 am retrieverman

      Except that golden jackals and coyotes are sister taxa.

      They represent the older “wolf” lineages than the modern wolf and dog species.


  3. on August 24, 2012 at 12:35 pm Jen Robinson

    You could go further . . . jackal, dog, wolf, and fox are all meaningless terms. But then, so, too, are “oak”, “gum (in the sense of Eucalyptus)” and “ironwood (which seems to refer to a different species everywhere you go)”.
    It will be interesting to see what the classification looks like after the second and third drafts. My guess is the DNA analysis will undergo a few revisions and some of the lineages will change as genetic data accumulates and assumptions in the classification algorithm are challenged and changed.
    The interaction between venacular, Linnean, and DNA-based categories will provide interesting reading in the next few decades.


  4. on August 24, 2012 at 12:42 pm Jen Robinson

    p.s. I think humor and surprise are more appropriate than judgement, given the present rapidly changing scientific basis of classification. I can only appreciate the fox dimension of these controversies based on personal experience. It was surprising to find that the genetic gulf between the ‘grey’ and ‘red’ ‘foxes’ is as wide as it is. Similarities brought on by convergent evolution may not show in DNA . . . but they are still similarities.


    • on August 24, 2012 at 1:01 pm retrieverman

      Gray foxes shouldn’t even be called foxes.

      And their name is so banal that people mix them up with all sorts of unrelated canids, including the chilla, which sometimes called the South American gray fox.

      A name that does not help, because Urocyon is found in South America, too!

      Of course no South American wild dog is a fox either. They just sometimes get called that.


  5. on August 24, 2012 at 3:01 pm Jackal is a meaningless term | Pet Care from the Web

    […] The Retriever, Dog, & Wildlife Blog Posted in Pet Care Articles | Tagged Jackal, meaningless, term | Leave a comment […]


  6. on August 25, 2012 at 10:55 pm Steve Bodio

    At least metaphorically “Old World Coyote” works for me– or “American jackal” for yotie if we leave out the outlying two species or rename them.

    More seriously, naming isn’t the issue if we understand the lines of descent.

    Observation: A certain amount of intuition is useful here almost as much as cladistic analysis. Cuon (dhole) has always seemed very “Canis” to me despite– possibly superficial– differences.


    • on August 25, 2012 at 11:11 pm retrieverman

      The only reason why Lycaon and Cuon are in separate genera is because they have trenchant heel dentition, a trait they share with the bush dog of South America.

      At one time, they were all classified together, but now we know that bush dogs are related to maned wolves and not anything like a dhole. (They are kind of like basset dholes, though).



Comments are closed.

  • Like on Facebook

    The Retriever, Dog, and Wildlife Blog

    Promote Your Page Too
  • Blog Stats

    • 9,592,938 hits
  • Retrieverman’s Twitter

    • @cyborgsuzy I hated all my time in the DC area. Same reason. Toxic culture. Makes you feel like you're in some kin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 10 hours ago
    • @TetZoo That was the proto QAnon conspiracy theory. Wow. America is sending out lots of toxic slime conspiracy theo… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
    • @cyborgsuzy Sounds like it would work. In theory.... 1 week ago
    • 2 people followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 1 week ago
    • one person unfollowed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 1 week ago
  • Google rank

    Check Google Page Rank
  • Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
  • Recent Comments

    markgelbart on Retiring this Space
    oneforestfragment on Retiring this Space
    The Evolving Natural… on So does the maned wolf break t…
    SWestfall3 on So does the maned wolf break t…
    Ole Possum on So does the maned wolf break t…
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,703 other followers

  • Pages

    • About
    • Contact
    • Patreon
    • Premium Membership
    • Services
  • Subscribe to Retrieverman's Weblog by Email
  • Revolver map

    Map

  • Top Posts

    • The Alaskan Noble Companion Dog
  • SiteCounter

    wordpress analytics
    View My Stats
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,703 other followers

  • Donate to this blog

  • Top 50 Northwest Dog Blogs

    top 50 dog blogs

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    %d bloggers like this: