Yep. It’s a real photo!
This is a skill they’d better perfect if they wish to survive.
Right now there is a lot of talk about whether polar bears will go extinct as the climate changes.
The animal has become very much a symbol of demise of ice in the Arctic Ocean, where the bears prey on seals that that whelp on the ice.
The theory goes that if polar bears, they are automatically doomed to extinction.
I have always found this to be a very simplistic (and somewhat alarmist) proposition.
Please note that I do believe climate change is a major problem, and yes, we must do what we can to reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
What I don’t accept is that polar bears are automatically doomed by climate change.
There are two major reasons why:
The first is that polar bears are not stupid animals. They can learn to utilize new food sources fairly easily, and I don’t think for a minute that they are doomed because they can no longer hunt ice seals. The seals themselves might be doomed, because if they try to whelp on shore, they are going to be easy pickings for just about every predator. Climate change is happening too fast for these seals to evolve new reproductive strategies.
But polar bears themselves can learn to hunt other things. I see a future in which polar bears become the ultimate scavengers, competing with wolf packs that have brought down moose. Wolves will have a very hard time protecting their kills from such behemoth scavengers, and this certainly will put a new selection pressure on wolves in northern Canada and Alaska, who have had to worry only about about more omnivorous and generally smaller brown bear subspecies scavenging their kills.
Also, for those of you who are not aware, the short arctic summer brings about some of the most productive avifaunal events in the world. There are hundreds of birds that fly north to the arctic each spring to lay their eggs.
Why do they do this?
Well, during the summer, the sun is beating down almost 24 hours a day. That’s very good for plants, and it’s also good for insects that eat the plants, which are very good for certain birds to eat.
So if you’re a small insectivorous bird, and you want to raise your chicks in a productive environment, you go to the arctic to raise your young. There are hundreds of species that have evolved to do just that.
And then there are other birds that fly up there to hunt those little birds, and there are others, such as snow geese, that fly up there to raise their offspring in vast green meadows that erupt each summer.
There is already evidence that polar bears are taking advantage of the arctic’s annual avifaunal glut.
Polar bears are eating now eating snow goose eggs, which are quite high in fat. The geese produce enough eggs every year to sustain a healthy population of polar bears, and if polar bears began to capitalize on birds, they would be able to survive a warming climate, where ice seals are either extinct or whelping elsewhere.
The other thing is that polar bears have survived warming periods before.
And how do we know this?
Well, it turns out that brown and polar bears are very close relatives. The two species can interbreed and produce fertile offspring, which has caused quite a bit of confusion about the age of the polar bear species.
Early mitochondrial DNA studies have suggested that polar bears are a recent offshoot of the brown bear lineage. If this were true, it would mean that the polar bear rapidly evolved to fit its niche within the past 150,000 years, which would almost make them a subspecies of the brown bear. Later genome-wide analysis revealed that the polar bear actually an older species. It evolved some 600,000 years ago from the brown bear lineage. Even more extensive genome-wide analysis found that polar bears were more likely in the 4 to 5 million year old range.
But it actually showed that polar bears have survived warming periods before, and they very likely will survive this one. If polar bears were a very recent offshoot of brown bears that had become specialized to arctic sea ice, their chances of survival would be much lower than they are now, but it now turns out that they aren’t as specialized to sea ice as we may have originally believed.
The other way we know polar bears have survived warming periods is through the evidence of hybridization in brown bear populations.
We actually now have two very good examples of this hybridization.
The first of these was the discovery that extinct Irish brown bears had almost the same mitochondrial DNA as polar bears.
And back when we believed polar bears were fairly recent species, it was suggested that all polar bears evolved from those Irish brown bears.
There was also another population of brown bears that had similar mtDNA to polar bears. The brown bears of Alaska’s Admiralty, Baranof, and Chichagof (“ABC” ) Islands, also share an mtDNA sequence that is similar to that of polar bears. For a very long time, it was believed that polar bears evolved from these brown bears.
But the separation was even more recent– only 14,000 years ago. If this were true, then polar bears would be a species younger than the domestic dog.
Of course, that notion was destroyed through the genomic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA is only a tiny piece of the genome, and it is inherited only via the female ancestors. Studies that use only this data simply do not get the full picture, and there are many, many revisions in the literature that have come from errors in mtDNA analysis.
So I was quite pleased to see a recent study on the ABC Islands’ brown bear population. It was a genomic study, and it found that these bears are actually derived from polar bears, not the other way around.
The researchers conclude that at some point during a warming period, a population of polar got stranded on these islands. They remained on those islands, feeding on a wide variety of food sources for male brown bears to reach them.
This study also suggested that initial finding that polar bears were derived from Irish brown bears was also in error. Instead, something similar had happened. Female polar bears became stranded in Ireland and then mated with native Irish brown bears. Over time, the main mtDNA lineage of Irish brown bears was replace by that of those bears that were derived from those polar bears– perhaps the polar bear blood infusion was a bit of genetic rescue or provided some other competitive advantage.
These genetic studies show that polar bears are not bound to the sea ice.
As intelligent, opportunistic predators, they have been able to survive warming periods, and they have been able to survive through hybridization with their closest relative.
If I were going to bet on the future of the polar bear, I would have to bet that it will survive the current warming period.
I’m not so sure about the ice seals, and I think they are a more appropriate icon for the movement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
When it comes to adapting to change, one would not be wise to bet against any species of bear, unless we’re talking the giant panda.
The panda is pretty much screwed.
No arguments there.
But I think the future for the polar bear in this warming world is much better than many people are forecasting.
This isn’t an overly specialized animal in the same way a giant panda is.
It can adapt. It can learn.
It’s not as bound to the ice as people think.
It’s evolutionary history clearly reveals this fact.
Now, before commenting on this post. Please read it in its entirety.
I am not denying climate change. Nowhere in that post do you see the words “Global warming is a hoax.” (except right here!)
This is pretty hardcore. They use an archery set on the bear!
You can’t take polar bear trophies into the United States today. This animal was taken at Norwegian Bay, which is in Nunavut in the far north of Canada.
This animal was taken before the US listed this species as threatened under the ESA, which led to the banning of the importation of polar bear trophies, but its hide may still be in Canada.
I found the hunt itself quite fascinating.
The dogs are very useful in baying up the bear so the hunter can get clean shot.
Some may take issue with me posting this video.
But using dogs to hunt polar bears is one of the oldest traditions in the arctic.
It’s very unlikely that the dogs we call sled dogs today were used primarily in hauling sleds.
Vilhjalmur Stefansson suggest that widespread use of dogs as draft animals in the arctic couldn’t happen until the native peoples procured firearms. Rifles allowed them to kill enough game to feed large numbers of dogs for hauling purposes. Before that, Stefansson believed that the dogs were primarily used for hunting, and most families kept only a pair of dogs for hunting.
I’m probably going to catch some criticism for posting this video.
I don’t hate polar bears. I certainly don’t want them to go extinct.
But I just found the hunt so impressive that I will show you it to you.
You can make up your own mind what you think about it.
But I was glad to have found it.
Remember when I said that polar bears should be considered a subspecies of brown bear?
I was wrong.
There was a study of ancient brown bear, modern brown/grizzly bear, and polar bear mtDNA that found that all polar bears have brown bear mtDNA that can be trace to a single female brown bear that lived in Ireland 20,000 to 30,000 years ago.
I then broke my own rule about believing mtDNA studies and accepted these findings.
I did not report, as some places did, that polar bears evolved in Ireland.
What happened was that a male polar bear mated with a female Irish brown bear, and it turned out that all living polar bears descend from that coupling. The crossbred bears bread back into polar bears, and the only thing they have that is brown bear is that mtDNA.
Now, based upon that evidence, I suggested that polar bears ought to be considered a specialized subspecies of brown bear.
Well, a nuclear DNA study came out yesterday that shot that possibility down.
This study revealed that polar and brown bears split about 600,000 years ago. There was some cross-breeding between the two over that time period, but the two lineages have been distinct for a long time.
Instead of polar bears being a subspecies of brown bear, we have a species complex that exists between Ursus arctos and Ursus maritimus.
The two species can and do interbreed when they wind up sharing territory, which isn’t often.
However, it is possible hybridization has affected the evolution of both species.
In addition to that finding about Irish brown bears, another mtDNA study found that brown bears living in Alaska’s Alexander Archipelago have mtDNA that is very similar to that of a polar bear. It is possible that a female polar bear wound up on the islands. She mated with brown bears, and her offspring then bred back into the brown bear population. For what ever reason– perhaps inbreeding– all the brown bears of that island descend from that female polar bear.
I know of know studies that have looked at these bears from this perspective.
Mitochondrial DNA studies don’t tell us everything.
We need to be careful when citing them as absolute fact.
They can really skew results.