Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Not very big ones!

IMG_1157

The wrinkles on my knuckles should give you an idea about scale:

IMG_1158

Smaller than a can of pop!

I had Muscovy ducks as a child, but I know next to nothing about keeping mallards. They are in a brooder right now. It’s very cold here today  (in the high 40′s). So they won’t be getting wet any time soon.

 

 

About these ads

toy fox terrier

It’s well-known that I have my own opposition to religious tenet of blood purity that has unfortunately poisoned so much of dog culture.

If it were acceptable that golden retrievers could still be crossed with flat-coats or Labradors and still get the puppies registered with the AKC and the entire FCI system, I’d be all for it. But if you do any crossbreeding within these breeds, the descendants can never be registered as any breed. There use to be an “Interbred” retriever classification with the Kennel Club (of the UK), but now, if you cross a golden with a yellow Labrador, none of the descendants of that cross can ever be registered as golden retrievers, even if they look just like normal golden retrievers.

Not this was not always the case.

In the 1920′s, when both golden and Labrador retrievers were recognized as distinct breeds by the Kennel Club, the Haulstone line of golden retrievers experienced an outcross to a field champion yellow Labrador retriever, FTCh Hayler’s Defender. If you play around on pedigree databases enough, you’ll find descendants of this dog in both golden and Labrador pedigrees.

But right now, an outcross between two breeds is a genetic dead-end, and you cannot use this tool to make improvements on the strains or increase genetic diversity.

I want this tool back in the hands of dog breeders, and I would be willing to buy a dog that looked like a golden retriever but had a Labrador three generations back in the same way I’ll eat a “Black Angus steak” that came from a steer whose great, great, great grandmother was a Hereford.

However, I’ve found that even among “working dog” writers that there is a resistance to outcrossing that so resembles that of the kennel club aversion to it that it’s really quite disconcerting.

And this doesn’t include those who are against all outcrossing.

Some of those who are okay with outcrossing with other breeds, or at least claim to be, are very adverse to crossing things into there own breed.

For example, there is a well-known “working terrier” expert who keeps Jack Russells for groundhog digging operations.

His biggest lament is that Jack Russells are getting too big for the job, and it’s harder and harder to find one small enough to do the work.

Well, there is an obvious solution to this problem.

The Jack Russell is a fox terrier. It’s a specific type of fox terrier that resembles those that were first distilled into a breed in the late eighteenth century, but fox terriers became a global breed.  And now there are dozens of offshoots of the family.

One of these is called a toy fox terrier. It’s a toy breed, which isn’t much larger than a Chihuahua, and it’s not technically a working dog, though they are known for their intelligence. They may not be as game as Jack Russells, but they aren’t as far removed from Jack Russells as say a mastiff or a greyhound would be.

All one would have to do is a little crossing with toy fox terriers and Jack Russells, and then one could select for both small size and gameness and have the perfect sized terrier for the job.

The JRTCA even would allow descendants of those crosses to be registered, so long as they were within the JRTCA’s conformation requirements.

But I’ve never heard this terrier writer say anything about the potential of this cross, though I’m pretty sure he’s excoriated the existence of toy fox terriers as an anathema to “real terriers,” which includes only about 4 or 5 breeds and dachshunds, which are actually small Central European hounds, not terriers. (A full-sized dachshund would be something like a Hanoverian schweisshund.)

The Germans had no problems crossing miniature pinschers with dachshunds to make the little rabbit dachshunds that are used to hunt in rabbit warrens.

So why would someone be opposed to crossing toy fox terriers with Jack Russells to make a groundhog specialist-sized Jack Russells, especially when one can eventually get the descendants of the cross registered as Jack Russells with the JRTCA?

The truth is I really don’t think many of these working dog people are as opposed to the closed registry system as they claim to be.

Sure, some of those crosses are going to be too docile to do groundhogs, but in Europe, when breeders cross low drive conformation golden retrievers with higher drive working goldens, they get some pups in the litter that aren’t any good at retrieving.

But they still do it, because if they didn’t, they wouldn’t be getting new blood in.

If you want to turn a dog into a ferret, the opportunity is there.

The truth is both “working dog” people and “show dog” people are operating under the same paradigms.

It’s the same old song.

And we have to get out of this mythology on both sides if we are to confront the problems dogs face in a rational manner.

 

 

 

wolf

One of the most interesting things about the American right these days is how openly they embrace all sorts of intrigues and conspiracies. Perhaps the most absurd is the one about the government intentionally causing tornadoes to bring about both socialism and the New World Order!

But this stuff is actually old hat.

Anyone who has ever followed predator reintroduction politics in Western countries knows that conspiracy theories are rampant among those who oppose predator reintroduction.

These sentiments are well-known in the American West, where wolves are accused of killing everything, including grizzly bears.

But it’s not just confined to the United States, zoologist Lars Thomas writes about the situation in Denmark, which currently under an invasion of wolves wandering up from Germany. By “invasion,” I mean the odd dispersing young wolf has crossed through Schleswig-Holstein into the Jutland Peninsula.  Thomas writes:

Wolves have been a big issue in Denmark for several months now – for the first time in 200 years we now have wolves living in our little country – two of them to be exact. But unfortunately all the loonies have started to come out of the woodwork as well. Some people seem to have their knowledge of wolves from the tales of the Brothers Grimm, and we have been subjected to all kinds of paranoid and hysterical ramblings from people who are now too frightened to take a walk in their local wood, from politicians who are certain the wolves have been released by biologists as part of some kind of underhanded scheme to suppress people living in rural areas.

That’s exactly what we have over here.

And it’s not just confined to the West.

In my home state, we have little weekly newspapers that include local columns. Most of these are just ramblings about one’s neighbors have been up to, and if you’re not in the community, you really don’t get all the intricacies  and vagaries that are contained in the lines. Most talk about how many people were at the community church.

Very few get political.

In my home county, there is one of these weekly columns that does get political.  It’s basically all the local stories mixed the distillations from the bizarre World Net Daily website. It also includes examples of great zoological erudition.

For example:

The snow went away and the turkey buzzards returned and the spring peepers are now peeping. Speaking of buzzards, one fellow noted that one of the invasive, non-native black buzzards had a wingspan of 56″. The black buzzards pick out the eyes of newborn calves, lambs, etc. and also target people.

Calling New World vultures “buzzards” is one of those Americanisms that drives me batty. It’s on the level of Canadians calling a Richardson’s ground squirrel a “pocket gopher,” when it’s clearly not a gopher at all. It’s a squirrel, not really all that different from a prairie dog, which is also a ground squirrel.

But there are so many, many errors here. Black vultures are native to the Virginias. However, they are very uncommon west of the Blue Ridge Mountains, which is where 99.9 percent of West Virginia is located. (John Denver never looked at a map.)

In recent years, there have been a few vagrant flocks of black vultures that have popped up here and there. The only ones I’ve ever seen here were in a tree at the edge of a pasture just outside the little town of Glenville, West Virginia in the spring of 2005.  There were about a dozen of them, and of these, two were walking around in the open where I could get a good glimpse of them as I drove by.

Many people assume that because black vultures do engage in predatory behavior and do sometimes target livestock, such as newborn lambs and calves, that they are larger than the much more common turkey vulture. However, in reality, turkey vultures tend to be slightly larger than black vultures.  A turkey vulture can have a wingspan of up to 72 inches, so a vulture with a wingspan of 56 inches would be a smaller vulture than normal.

And it probably would be a black vulture.

And yes, they do prey on lambs and calves, and depredations by black vultures on lambs in Texas Hill country have been well-documented as a major problem for sheep producers.

However, they don’t target people.

You’d have to be quite paranoid to think that at any moment a giant bird is going to drop out of the sky and carry you away.

As African-derived primates, this is a fear for which we had some justification in our evolutionary past.  The famous Taung child was believed to have been killed by a prehistoric African crowned eagle, whose relatives still hunt monkeys in Africa today.

But for modern Americans to fear a vulture that only attacks newborn calves and lambs is probably one of the most absurd things I’ve ever heard. Do you realize how much bigger a person is than a black vulture?

Of course, he doesn’t leave his paranoia with the “black buzzards,” the avian black helicopters.

No, he thinks Eastern coyotes, which wandered in here from New England and Eastern Canada after cross-breeding with relict populations of wolves, were actually introduced by the insurance companies in an attempt to reduce deer-related collisions with automobiles.

The other day a cattleman went out to check on his herd and noticed that one of his favorite cows, who happened to be expecting, was missing. He went on a hunt and found her with a fine new calf in the woods but she and the calf were worn out as three coyotes were circling looking for a tasty meal. A Mr. Remington equalized one of the exotic varmints and the other two fled the scene as they knew they would have an allergic reaction to hot lead. Someone else noted that they trapped one that had an ear tag that said “Property of State Farm Insurance”.

Coyotes are not “exotic varmints” at all. During the Pleistocene, large coyotes were common in West Virginia, and there is at least some historical evidence to suggest that some form of coyote may have existed in the Eastern US before being extirpated with the wolves.

And if anything, the coyotes haven’t done a very good job at reducing deer populations.

And this fact, of course, wasn’t missed by The Creston News.

One local resident saw one of the wolves that had been turned lose locally. He tried to shoot it but the shot was too long and the varmint escaped. One fellow noted that someone in the DNR was given millions by insurance companies to turn the wolves loose to kill the deer that were causing car wrecks. Earlier they had tried the coyotes but they didn’t do the job well enough.

So now we have wolves!

(We actually don’t).

This sort of folk zoology is what I call the Dale Gribble school. It’s not based upon science. Instead, it’s based upon a certain amount of paranoia that experts, who are suspected of being Marxists or liberals or Illuminati types, are using predator reintroduction to end the rural way of life.

Rural life in America and Western Europe has essentially been destroyed.

So few people in this countries live in rural areas that it is difficult to understand why people are so against predators.

Part of the reasons are rational:   Coyotes, wolves, and black vultures do kill stock, and in some areas, wolves and coyotes have been implicated in reducing the populations of some prey species.

But these reasons take on a theater of the absurd when they get mixed in with rural cultural politics.

Many people in traditional rural areas see their entire world falling apart before their very eyes.

It’s outsider liberals in the cities who want to take their guns, let the gays marry, and reject Christianity and “family values.”

The predators become scapegoats for that anger.

And the animals as biological entities simply are not seen for what they are.

They are seen for what they represent.

Hippies.

Yuppies.

And Ecothugs who just want to end all that is decent in the world.

It is nothing more than the culture wars’ ecological front.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source.

Source.

Also the hazards of trying to crack an egg using just one hand!

This is an old golden retriever parlor trick, and I one that would actually bring me wild turkey eggs out of their nests as presents!

 

Source.

This guy needs a TV show.

After the rain

We had a big thunderstorm today. In fact, about 20 minutes after I had my encounter with the little black squirrel, I got caught out in it. I got drenched.

Miley, of course, knew it was coming and had more sense than me. She stayed home.

But after the rain we went out, and it was absolute perfection. I love these May and June rains.  Everything is so green and lush now that it is likely walking through a magnificent garden.

047

067

079

080

060

086

050

088

041

040

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 534 other followers

%d bloggers like this: