Well, relatively long-muzzled.
June 25, 2011 by retrieverman
Posted in dog breeds | 9 Comments
Comments are closed.
| The Bearden Pack on The morel of the story… | |
| M.R.S. on The morel of the story… | |
| Will and Eko on It’s spring time in West… | |
| Labrador Retriever I… on Merritt Clifton: German Shephe… | |
| Myra on Merritt Clifton: German Shephe… |

Yes, indeed! Obviously the lucky dog had no need for a surgeon to ease his breathing!
On the other hand, he may have benefitted if fed a bit less… ;)
That one German club’s Pugs are a pretty good match for that guy: http://www.mprv.de/
Wow. They are!
You will find that picture on their website, check “Qualzucht”, right at the bottom :)
I’ve seen ’em.
Today, I saw a boston terrier with a muzzle like that.
Most Bostons nowadays look like French Bulldogs in the head, imo. I prefer the more ‘terrier’ type heads, the way they originally had.
yes, I agree about the FB head. This guy looked more like the miniature APBT the B(bull)T’s started out as…
Example of the ‘ideal BT’ head nowadays: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v485/Pietoro/webjunk/Boston1.jpg
The AKC standard says: “The muzzle is short, square, wide and deep and in proportion to the skull. It is free from wrinkles, shorter in length than in width or depth; not exceeding in length approximately one-third of the length of the skull. The muzzle from stop to end of the nose is parallel to the top of the skull.”
I almost never see a show-type Boston with a muzzle even -approaching- 1/3 the length of their head! And can pushed-in nose really be called ‘proportional’ to the skull? Meh, ring fashion always seems to reward the extreme.
When pugs were not so popular in the middle of the 19th century, two were imported into the UK, one with a slightly longer muzzle in order to improve “type”.
Many arguments occurred late 19th century as to the correct “type”.
This was just before the UK Pug Dog Club was set up, a new breed standard created.
All went downhill for the breed since then…….