Feeds:

Archive for June, 2009

I'm very much a golden person.

I'm very much a golden person.

What follows are some generalizations based upon my experiences. Because you have different experiences than I do, you may have different opinions. I respect them. Please respect mine.

1. Labs do have a lot of energy. The American trial Labrador is usually a very hot-blooded animal with lots of spirit and more than a little stubbornness.  Some can be scatty, and others are furry lunkers that can’t be controlled without judicious application of the e-collar. A lot of these Labs also lack retrieving instinct and must be force-fetched. (The average working gundog should never need to go through it. It should be a natural retriever.) It’s still possible to find good lines of working Labrador that aren’t too extreme in this regard. However, the chances of getting one of these wild ones is too high these days. With goldens, high energy is something to still be breeding for. In fact, pet goldens are being bred that lack drive and instinct. If you get a golden, chances are it won’t be one of these wild dogs. (I really don’t like a very calm golden retriever, but I think if you had one that was as up as some of these Labs are, you would have problems very quickly).

2. Labs are not as easy to train for normal purposes as a golden. Now, for waterfowl and retriever trials, they are far better. But goldens are far easier to precision train for dog sports. As house dogs, I find them easier to housebreak and easier to teach simple obedience commands.

3. Labs are more neotenous than goldens are. This means that they don’t develop as many wolf-like behaviors as goldens develop.

http://books.google.com/books?id=BLzDLvXXWoUC&pg=PA143&lpg=PA143&dq=neoteny+dogs+golden+retrievers&source=bl&ots=hiWiAJ8dDu&sig=HSG78sR_UeiyPqiL0YZ3kcQcSMQ&hl=en&ei=ILI9Sv6-DsqEtwe29MkC&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9

4. Goldens have a better nose than Labradors. Goldens are also natural air scenters and quaterers, which is bad for a trial dog but very useful in a flushing retriever in heavy cover.

5.  Goldens mature later than Labs. This is supposed to be a negative if you’re a trialer. I happen to like a dog that as a bit longer childhood, because then you have more time to put in foundations in your training and socialization.

6. My goldens have lived longer than the working Labs I’ve known. Now, this may no longer be the case, but when the Labs died at 10 or 11, my goldens still made it 13 and 14.

7. If there is a border collie of the gun dogs, the golden is it. Before BC’s became AKC dogs, goldens simply took over the obedience trial. If you wanted to do competitive obedience, you got a golden to start out. Then you figured out to do it with something harder– like a basenji.

8. I prefer setter and spaniel behavior in a hunting dog but with much more control. The golden has a lot of setter and spaniel quartering behavior. They aren’t great at speed as flushing dogs, but because they are so easy to train, it is easier to teach them how to quarter closer. Labs don’t have the golden’s nose, and I find their quartering behavior to be very different. They are either methodical like black Clumbers or they run around like black springers.

9. I have had three super smart golden retrievers, which have all been very easy to train. They also have been superb at problem solving. All three have figured out how to open doors on their own. One taught the other how to open the door. The current dog figured it out when she was about 5 months old.

10.  “If everyone jumped off a bridge, would you do it?”

Labs are popular, and many are good working gundogs. If you want a trial dog, there are many more lines of working Lab than golden. If you want a dog that works in the old-fashioned way, that is very easy to train as a pet but takes longer to train as a retriever, I’d say go for a golden.

I’m biased toward goldens. I don’t deny this.

There are good Labs are there. There are many of them.

You do have to hunt to find a good golden. Good Labs are far more common.

It’s just the Labrador isn’t for me.

I’ve never actually written why I prefer goldens to Labs before. It may be that I just met the right goldens early on, and first impressions have a very strong impact upon perception.

I respect Labrador people for making their decisions.  I’m sure their dogs are good.

It’s just that I like the old-fashioned retrievers.  I like dogs that look like they belong in Edwardian shoots in the last halcyon days of the Empire. Call me romantic or a touch nostalgic, but the golden is the only common retriever that still has that mystique.

Read Full Post »

America’s native retriever

chesapeake retrieving

The United States has only one native retriever– unless you also count the Boykin spaniel and American water spaniels as retrievers. We, however, have only a single breed derived from the St. John’s water dog. Of course, here, I’m talking of what was once called the “Chesapeake ducking dog.” We know it officially as the Chesapeake Bay retriever.

The breed is anomaly among retrievers. Not only are its origins in the United States, but it also very different from the other retrievers. Now, I’ve been told that curly-coat is like a Chessie, but I’ve also been told that Chesapeakes are an outlier among retrievers.

You see, most other retrievers were bred by aristocrats. The curly and Murray River curly had some blue collar roots. The curly was used by poachers on the great estates of the early nineteenth century, and the Murray River curly was used as a meat dog along the marshes of its native river. The Chesapeake, though, was the market hunters’ dog.

And that required a different temperament.

Chesapeake Bay isn’t the Grand Banks, but it is cold and stormy ocean at certain times of the year. To have a dog that could fetch shot birds efficiently from the sea in all sorts of weather, the hunters bred a tougher, more drivey retriever that would brave the water with little hesitation. They also needed a dog that would guard the boats and their owners’ daily harvest, so the Chesapeake was bred to much more protective than the others.

Some of old-line Chessie were extremely “rugged.” These dogs were really tough customers. They were often criticized for having hard mouths and surly dispositions. Some of this criticism may have been warranted, but I think some of the comparisons were unfair. After all, Chesapeakes are more protective than Labradors, but Labradors are known for being rather terrible guards anyway.  How much of this reputation comes from being compared to genteel British dogs and how much of it comes from a fair assessment of the breed’s temperament is still up to conjecture.

Now, let me set a few things straight about this breed. I often read that this breed is descended from the Newfoundland, and of course, this gets people thinking of the dog we call a Newfoundland today.  Actually, just like all the other retrievers, the Chesapeake is descended from the St. John’s water dog.

In fact, the Chesapeake descends from two of these dogs that survived a shipwreck in Chesapeake Bay 1807. There were two of them– a dog and a bitch. The bitch was the more typical black coloration and was given the name “Canton” (after the ship). The dog, however, was a reddish liver. He was named “Sailor.”

The two dogs most likely were not bred together. Perhaps they were littermates or close relatives.

“Sailor” was described as such:

[H]e was of fine size and figure-lofty in his carriage, and built for strength and activity; remarkably muscular and broad across the hips and breast; head large, but not out of proportion; muzzle rather longer than is common with that race of dogs; his colour a dingy red, with some white on the face and breast; his coat short and smooth, but uncommonly thick, and more like a coarse fur than hair; tail full, with long hair, and always carried very high. His eyes were very peculiar: they were so light as to have almost an unnatural appearance, something resembling what is termed a wail eye, in a horse; and it is remarkable, that in a visit which I made to the Eastern Shore, nearly twenty years after he was sent there, in a sloop which had been sent expressly for him, to West River, by Governor Lloyd, I saw many of his descendants who were marked with this peculiarity.

Now, this is where the story gets interesting. Governor Lloyd was a planter and sporting gentlemen. He wound up purchasing “Sailor” in exchange for a Merino ram. (This was when everyone wanted to have Merino sheep to improve wool stock. He was Frederick Douglass’s original owner.)

It is generally believed that Sailor’s line begat the Eastern shore strain, while Canton founded the Western shore line. These two lines were not kept exclusively by sporting gentlemen.

One reason is that Chesapeake Bay had a thriving market hunter industry. Shooting as many birds as possible for the fine dining tables in Eastern cities required a dog that could retrieve rapidly and with very little direction.

The breed became popular among people who liked to shoot. General Custer had at least one Chesapeake, and it thought “Sailor Boy” was descended from Custer’s retriever or retrievers. Sailor Boy was, of course, Teddy Roosevelt’s beloved retriever.

Much the most individual of the dogs and the one with the strongest character was Sailor Boy, a  Chesapeake Bay dog. He had a masterful temperament and a strong sense of both dignity and duty. He would never let the other dogs fight, and he himself never fought unless circumstances imperatively demanded it.

Teddy Roosevelt

To me, this suggests that the Chesapeake was a protective breed, but nowhere near the maneater that so many old retriever books claim that it was.

Today, the breed is far less common than goldens and Labradors. However, as a breed, it is usually easier to find a dog that is a natural retriever. After all, goldens and Labs have been bred as pets for many, many generations. Chesapeakes are still more commonly bred for work. Their breeders have sought to keep their breed a working dog, and that may be why the breed isn’t that popular.  And popularity can be a curse– just look at the average golden retriever!

I’ll be honest that I’m not a Chesapeake person.

I’m much more accustomed to Labs, goldens, and flat-coats. And if you expect a Chessie to be like one of those, you’ll be sorely mistaken.

Those years developing on the Chesapeake Bay as a guardian, meat dog, and assistant to the market hunters shaped a different dog than those softer British retrievers.

Over the years, some lines have developed are more like Labradors than others. I don’t know whether that is a good thing for the breed or not. The Labrador started out as a British estate retriever that later evolved into a field trial specialist. (Contrary to popular belief, Labradors are from Britain, but they are derived from the very similar St. John’s water dog, a Newfoundland breed.)

I don’t think the true Chessie purist would like to see his or her breed turn into a Labrador. I certainly wouldn’t like it if goldens became like English show Labradors. This breed has a certain essence that its most devoted fans can appreciate. If they wanted a Labrador, they would’ve bought one.

I do hold out some hope for the Chesapeake, simply because the fad breeders and the pet market haven’t really worked on this breed. It’s still pretty much as it was.

And let’s hope it stays that way.

Read Full Post »

Jack Russell and Some Feists

From SquirrelHunterGray

For those of you who have seen me use the word “feist,” I mean a landrace terrier-type evolved on American frontier. Its ancestry is cosmopolitan. Small British terriers, whippets, Italian greyhounds, beagles, Native American dogs (like the “canoe dogs”), and probably some rustic German pinschers (which looked a lot like the Austrian pinscher) are in the background of these dogs.  I have known people to cross in really game chihuahuas with their feists, and I’ve also know them to add cur-types and Norwegian elkhounds to their strains.

To the layperson, a feist looks a lot like a Jack Russell. That’s because the ancestral fox terrier is an important ancestor of the feist, and a Jack Russell is very similar to the ancestral fox terrier.

However, there are some differences. Feists typically do not have their tails docked. Jack Russells almost always do. Feists often have prick ears, but in Jack Russells, this is faulty.

Jack Russells are earth dogs, and they are often so game that they will go to ground after prey. Feists usually aren’t that game and are usually too large follow the prey down the burrow anyway. Some of the bigger feists approach 40 pounds in weight. Feists are usually used to tree game, usually squirrels, and bark like crazy when they have the animal in a tree. They can also be used as a flushing breed for grouse. However, grouse will not fly away from a very small feist. Typically, the feist will send the grouse into the trees, where it is unsportsmanlike to shoot them.

Feists are the terrier-type of the American frontier. They have an illustrious history, which you can read about here.

I have always been into feists, because I had a bench-legged feist for a few months. This dog had been found by relatives in Eastern North Carolina, and we mistook her for a large dachshund. It was only recently that I realized what she was. She had dewclaws on her hindlegs, a tawny coat with a white spot on the chest, and black mask.

She was quite dog aggressive when she first arrived. She hated my golden retriever, but my golden retriever had a way with other dogs. Within two weeks, she broke the feist of ever wanting to fight other dogs. Of course, the golden had nothing to fear from a 25 pound feist. She was more than twice the feist’s size, and she could run circles around her.

I have no idea how the golden retriever taught the feist how to get on with other dogs. I think her confident, gentle nature was infectious, and the feist just couldn’t resist it. She turned into a very playful dog.

However, we couldn’t keep her. She liked to chase cattle, and the neighbors had a small herd.

But she did find a good home where she was taken squirrel hunting every fall.

Now, we always thought she was a dachshund cross– maybe with basset.

However, I was perusing the various strains of feist and cur that can be found in the US. In parts of the coastal South, the feists are bench-legged, that is with short, crooked legs like you used to see in dachshunds. They also have more than a slight trace of hound in them, which gives them a dachshund-like appearance.

The feist landrace where I live are usually called treeing feists, mountain feists, and rat terriers. While the rat terrier is a standardized breed and has been for over a hundred years, the other two have only recently been separated. In fact, a lot of feist breeders mix and match strains, and recently, they’ve added Jack Russell to their dogs. The distinctions between the feist and rat terrier strains where I live are quite nebulous, and I’ve more than once called a dog a rat terrier, when its owners call it a feist, and vice versa.

In fact, the arrival of the Jack Russell to this part of the world has been rather momentous for the feist. It is something akin to the arrival of the golden retriever to the Upper Midwest, where the American water spaniel had long been the preferred retrieving breed. Lots of former feist owners have taken up Jack Russells. The Jack Russell can learn to tree squirrels in the same fashion. However, they are not natural trailers like some strains of feist are.

And they are a bit more dog aggressive. One would have hard time using Jack Russells in packs, but feists are used in packs regularly. Feists are traditionally occasionally used as bear dogs. They are very good at swarming the bear and making it run. And while I do know of a pack of Jack Russell bear dogs that also are used to catch pigs, most people who keep Jack Russells find them hard to keep in packs.

The Jack Russell, though, can double as an earth dog. And it’s just as good at ratting. They are also more uniform in appearance and temperament, and you know basically what you’re going to get in a litter. Further, JRT’s are popular dogs these days, as is keeping horses for pleasure. For some reason, people who keep horses also keep Jack Russells. This tradition may have come from British-style fox hunting, but I think it is more likely that the grain used to feed the horses always attracted rats. And a terrier is good thing to have when rats are around.

Jack Russells are game. In fact, the gamest dog I ever knew was my grandpa’s farm terrier, “Cabbage.” She was exiled to his house after proving to be a miserable suburban pet. She liked to kill things, and one day, she killed the neighbor’s cat. She was an excellent groundhog dog, squirrel dog, and “anything else” dog.  He ran the Jack Russell with his beagle cross, and the two of them were a hunting duo whose exploits became legendary.

Once they got after a ground hog on the neighbor’s property, not far from his pasture where he kept cattle. He heard dogs barking, and thinking they were chasing his cows, he ran out to see what was going on. He discovered the beagle baying at the side of his barn near a pile of rocks. Cabbage was standing on top of the rock pile, yippiung with all her might.

When cleared the rock pile to see what they were barking at, he discovered a large groundhog. No soon had the animal in the rock pile been exposed, Cabbage leaped upon it. She grabbed the ten pound animal by the throat and within two minutes, the groundhog was dead. Now, that doesn’t seem too strange until you realize cabbage weighed only about 12 pounds.

Rat terriers and feists of that size might tree a groundhog or bay it up in the rock pile, but very few would launch such a daring attack and actually kill the animal. Even that old 30 pound beagle wasn’t brave enough for such a move.

These stories began to circulate, and it wasn’t long before, I noticed fewer and fewer feists at farm houses. And I noticed more and more Jack Russells. Further, feist/JRT crosses were becoming common as squirrel dogs.

So right now, I’m actually watching a breed or type replacement in my area. I hope the feists can withstand the pressure that the little earth dogs are putting on them. A feist is not a Jack Russell, and some people surely prefer the level of gameness in the feist to that of the Jack Russell. Further, the feist is more multipurpose, and it is easier to run as a trail dog. But Jack Russells have everyone beguiled these days. I hope that they don’t wind up replacing the feists.

Read Full Post »

An interview with a Great Nature Writer

Source.

Farley Mowat is one of the best nature writers I’ve ever read.

He is always the iconoclast, and I happen to have a soft spot for people who try to look at things from very different perspectives than those currently accepted as orthodoxy.

Orthodoxy is a sedative. Heresy is a stimulant.

That’s how my brain works.

Read Full Post »

A very good interview with Farley Mowat

Source

Also see: Farley Mowat’s St. John’s Water Dog.

Read Full Post »

It’s a short-eared dog!

short-eared dog full body

The answer to yesterday’s “Name the Species”  is the short-eared dog (Atelocynus microtis). As far as I know, it is the only naturally occurring species of water dog. These animals have very webbed feet, which much more webbed than any domestic breed used in the water.  One way to think of this animal is as a cross between an otter and a dog. It spends a lot of time in and near the water, and its diet includes lots of fish, frogs,  and crabs.

Now it looks like a leggier version of the South American bush dog. However, its closest relative is the crab-eating fox(Cerdocyon thous). If the small-eared dog is the otter-dog, then the crab-eating fox is the mink-dog. It eats animals that appear along the banks of the rivers. In Venezuela, it is a creature of the Llanos, where it can be seen catching crabs in the floodplains.

Now the crab-eating fox is quite common. Native peoples know this animal well, and many have domesticated them and kept them as pets. South American wild dogs are closely related to the genus Canis and its allies, and the crab-eating fox is rumored to have crossed with a domestic dog. That’s far more likely than the a domestic dog crossing with a vulpine fox.

The short-eared dog, by contrast, is not well-known even by native peoples. It is not widely hunted, nor is it widely described in native folklore. Where it does exist, it exists at very low densities. As a result, we know very little about them.

The dogs give off a musky odor and can raise their hackles. The bitches are 1/3 larger than the dogs and do not have hackles or the musky odor. In all other dog species in existence, the bitches and vixens are smaller than the dogs.

What I find more interesting is that the short-eared dog can be rather short-haired. When nature creates a creature that can live in or near the water, evolution created a short-haired animal. This photo really shows the texture of the short-eared dog’s coat. Shorter hair is more practical in the water, for it doesn’t get bogged down, allowing the animal to swim more efficiently.

So the short-eared dog was the identity of the last “What is the species?” post.

And it didn’t hurt that wordpress automatically generated a link to an earlier post of mine that features a rare video of the short-eared dog.

South America has the greatest diversity of wild dogs species in the world, and it is really amazing how many unusual dogs can be found there. The short-eared dog is certainly one of them.

Read Full Post »

One lucky little bunny

 

Miley finally caught something.

On our evening jaunt last night, Miley dived into a clump of tall grass about twenty feet from the barn. Her blond plume tail waved from side to side, while her eyes focused with the determination of a seasoned huntress.

Then I heard the shrieks of pure terror. Miley had caught something!

When she finally emerged from the grass, I could tell that she was holding a small rabbit.

Eastern cottontails, unlike the European rabbits which they closely resemble, give birth in scrapes on the ground. Usually, the does find thick stands of grass  or brush heaps to place their natal scrapes. They care for their young for about a month, at which time the doe gives birth again. (Rabbits have post-partum estrus, which means that during the breeding season, a doe is constantly pregnant and nursing). Those little month-old rabbits are quite tiny, and because they have no burrow in which to hide, they are very vulnerable to predation.

Miley had caught one of these little month-old rabbits. It was no bigger than my hand, and I thought that she had killed it. She trotted down the trail with her catch in her mouth. You could tell that she was very proud of her catch, for he steps were a little higher than normal. Her head was carried high, and her long tail slowly waved from side to side. She looked like a proper hunting golden, if only she had been carrying a pheasant, duck, or even a large rabbit or hare. This miniscule rabbit was hardly classical retriever prey.

It is nearly a half mile from the barn to the house, but when we arrived, I saw Miley deposit the bunny on the ground. Then I saw it leap away. Miley stopped it with her paw and picked it up again. The rabbit was not dead!

She did this three times before I felt mercy for the little rabbit. It would have been one thing had she killed the rabbit quickly, but now she was torturing it. I think she thought the rabbit was some unusual toy– one that you drop on the ground and it runs off for you to catch. I couldn’t stand to watch it die such a terrible death, so I took the rabbit from her.

I examined the little bunny. He was covered in saliva (“retriever slime”), but he didn’t have a scratch on him. Then I remembered something. Golden retrievers have a very soft mouth. It has been selectively bred for many generations in that breed, and in retriever circles, the golden’s soft mouth is quite celebrated. My first golden’s favorite parlor trick was to retrieve eggs without breaking them, yet this dog also knew how to use her teeth to dispatch rabbits.

But then I also remembered that my first dog had to learn how to kill rabbits. She learned from my grandfather’s half gray-half black Norwegian elkhound, who would never have picked up a month-old rabbit without trying to eat it.

So this little bunny was quite lucky to have been caught by a dog that came from a long line of soft-mouth animals.

As I held him, I noticed that his little heart was racing. After all, he’d just journeyed half a mile in the jaws of a dog. I have had experience rehabilitating cottontails of this size, so I knew the best thing was put him in a shoe box and let him calm down. If I stressed him too much more, he would go into shock. So I put him in a shoe box and waited about a half hour, then I corralled Miley and carried the rabbit in the box back to the tall grass where he’d been captured.

I then released him. He charged deeper in the base of the grass. It was his lucky break. He probably wouldn’t have that fate the next time a predator captured him in the grass.  I knew that the next predator could be a cat, a fox, a coyote, or even a raccoon or opossum, and these predators don’t have soft golden retriever mouths.

But I gave the lucky little bunny one more chance, and that’s all I could do.

Of course, Miley wasn’t too happy that I’d taken away that wonderful new toy.

Miley tells me that this is her first step on her way to becoming like Old Yeller, her hero:

Source.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow