From The Telegraph:
The male fox weighed two stone or 26.5lb and was four foot long, about the height of a seven-year-old child.
The giant fox was captured and killed in Maidstone after a cat in the local neighbourhood was killed.
It was trapped in a cage and put down in a humane way by Keith Talbot, a local vet.
He said foxes had been seen around his parents house days after their 19-year-old tabby cat was found killed on the doorstep.
Zoologists and experts said foxes said foxes could be growing bigger because of ‘easy pickings’ of food scraps in dust bins or even left out by animal lovers.
A dog fox will often grow bigger than the rest of the pack because the social system means the alpha male gets most of the food and the rest get leftovers.
There are thought to be at least 34,000 urban foxes in Britain.
Recently there has been concerns the animals could pose a threat after twins Isabella and Lola Kouparis were attacked in their beds in London.
However animal rights campaigners point out that most foxes live on insects and small mammals and pose no harm to humans unless they are frightened.
The Field Sports Channel is offering £100 for the best story of the largest fox. One taker has come forward with claims he shot a fox weighting 34lb in 2009, although this has not been confirmed with photographic evidence.
I guess the English have adopted one of our customs. In the US, there are coyote killing competitions. In the West, these competitions are about seeing who can kill the most coyotes within a given amount of time. In the East, where big coyotes are legendary, the goal is to see who can kill the biggest one. Anyone who kills a black, white, or otherwise unusually colored individual also gets plaudits. (Remember, the ones in the East have some wolf ancestry.)
Another reason why these foxes could be getting larger is that they have virtually no predation. Wolves no longer exist in England, and fox hunting has been banned. That means that foxes now exist at higher densities than they once did, and it may be that foxes that are bigger and tougher are better at competing for both vixens and food resources than smaller ones. With all of these foxes living in relative proximity to each other, it may be that a dog fox that has some size advantage might be better able to spread his genes, simply by muscling his way around smaller individuals.
And access to food would also play a role. These foxes now have the nutrition to reach larger sizes.
The fact that this fox was killed in town means that he likely had access to really good nutrition his entire life. His ancestors may have been working their way towards the larger size as I describe may become possible when foxes exist at high densities.
Red foxes do vary quite a bit in size. A 26 to 34 pound fox is much larger than any fox around here. It actually would put them in the same class as the smallest of coyote bitches.
Now, I’ve never seen one in North America of this size, but I did see one last week.
It was a taxidermied specimen at the German Hunting and Fishing Museum (Deutsches Jagd- und Fischereimuseum). I was shocked at how large this fox was. It was the size of a beagle.
Where I live, red and gray foxes are about the same size– 8-12 pounds. Virtually all red foxes here are derived from English imports to Maryland and Virginia in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Genetically and morphologically, they are almost exactly the same as those foxes in England. Of course, there was a small native population of red foxes that lived in what is now the eastern US, but they were not that common before European settlement. (However, they did exist in Virginia during the Pleistocene).
The ones here also have very distinct black legs, which this particular fox does not have. Only its feet are black.
With 45 different subspecies of red fox, we should see lots of variance between them. Not only do they come in several distinct phases in the wild, they also vary quite a bit in terms of size.
As wild dogs go, they are the true inheritors of the wolf’s empire. They are now more widely distributed than any other wild carnivore. Not only do they still maintain a vast Holarctic range, that also includes the Nile Valley, they are also found in Australia. Like wolves, they have the ability to rapidly respond to selective pressures and change their morphology and behavior to fit new ecosystems and new niches.
Large size may be of some advantage for certain populations, and that is probably the main reason why giant foxes are starting to appear in different European countries.
But if that readily available food supply disappears and the foxes find themselves suffering from both competition and predation from other animals, the large size may not be quite so advantageous.






That fox is just about the size of the Gremlin. She’s almost 60 lbs.
She got a BB gun for Christmas and has been happily target shooting in the back yard.
awesum site
great read
happy new year
I am not sure of the point of all this.Anyway how can we learn about the larger animals if we keep killing them? Vets are meant to be intelligent people.
Thank you for insinuating that anyone who would hunt or shoot a fox is unintelligent.
Members of my own family have hunted foxes, both with the gun and with hounds (though with hounds, it was more properly called chasing, for the foxes were never killed).
Many states in the US have hunting recognized as a constitutional right, and the Commonwealth of Virginia recognizes fox hunting as its official state sport.
Please take your animal rights extremism elsewhere.
A fox of that size would definitely be killing both cats and lambs. Coyotes of the same size retard the sheep industry in the US.
It’s not like red fox are endangered, either. Or even at risk.
In England, they are as common as coyotes are here!
Friend of mine who lives in the middle of London sent me a picture of one in a planter in his garden. It was mangy. He says they are all over the place.
Mange is spread by overpopulation.
I’d rather be hunted than die of disease.
Don’t people leave food out for foxes in England? Suburban folks there have a very romantic vision of them.
There was a documentary about urban foxes on youtube.
I think some of these people think they are watching wolves in the High Arctic and they are half-assed English David Meches.
[…] Kent is also where the 26-pound fox was killed earlier this year. For comparison, that’s about the size of a small bitch coyote. […]
[…] Giant red fox killed in Kent Share this:TwitterFacebookRedditPrintDiggStumbleUponLinkedInEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]
Now that most humans have eliminated the apex predators in most environments & are themselves much less prone to hunt, evolutionary pressures are creating new apex predators. It all just makes a lot of sense.
As for humans hunting & killing foxes (or anything else for that matter), its an extension of our evolutionary history. We didn’t get our current dentition or digestive tracts by subsisting on only tubers, fruits and nuts. I personally prefer hunting for critters I’m willing to eat (that doesn’t include red foxes (pheeww!) or coyotes, but does include racoons and bears). But that’s my preference & not something I would try to force on others. A key thing to remember here as well is that hunters–thru both fees & donations–are among the biggest underwriters of conservation in the world. After all, one can’t hunt an extinct species.
Note: foxes & coyotes can’t prey on one’s cat if its kept indoors where it belongs. And although livestock guardian dogs may be outclassed by today’s super-wolves, they can & do do a good job of protecting lambs from foxes–llamas, mules, donkeys, emus & large geese are also very good at dissuading fox predation.
Also, Nick is right in that by hunting only the largest specimens, biggest racks, etc. we are putting evolutionary pressure on these prey species to be smaller. That is inescapable logic–keep on killing the biggest ones & you automatically give the smaller ones a breeding edge. I’m not condemning or condoning, just pointing out an evolutionary reality.