As most of your correctly figured out from the signature, this is an Adolf Hitler work.
Hitler was a decent dog artist, as this page clearly shows.
He wasn’t a Rembrandt, but surely the world could have withstood another mediocre artist much more easily than the genocidal monster that came out of that art school rejection.
[...] The Answer. [...]
Ever watched the movie “Max”? It speculates what might have happened had Hitler been more successful as an artist.
No. I’ve not.
Is it any good? LOL
The date seems to be 1923. If only he’d received better critiques…!
Hitler was better artist than most of us, it’s clear when you see his drawings and paintings. His destiny was to be something more than a painter, that’s very clear too.
[...] Hitler’s painting of a setter-type dog (retrieverman.net) [...]
[...] Hitler’s painting of a setter-type dog (retrieverman.net) [...]
[...] Hitler’s painting of a setter-type dog (retrieverman.net) [...]
[...] Hitler’s painting of a setter-type dog (retrieverman.net) [...]
[...] Hitler’s painting of a setter-type dog (retrieverman.net) [...]