Feeds:

Archive for the ‘Invasive species’ Category

Controlling stoats in New Zealand

(NB:  Stoats are called ermine or short-tailed weasels in the United States and Canada.)

From The Independent:

In Britain, stoats are part of the rhythm of nature. They prey on rabbits and rats; they are preyed on by foxes and eagles. In New Zealand, whose only land mammals were two species of bats until Europeans arrived, stoats are the single biggest threat to the unique and increasingly threatened native birdlife.

A world leader in conservation, New Zealand has saved some of its rarest birds from extinction by ridding off-shore islands of predators. Stoats, which can swim, were thought to have a maximum range of 1.5 kilometres (less than a mile). Recently, though, the sleek, furry killers have turned up on an island more than five kilometres from the mainland, raising questions about the safety of offshore sanctuaries.

Many of New Zealand’s birds live and nest on the forest floor. Some, such as kakapo, weka and kiwi, are flightless. When they feel under threat, they freeze, making them easy prey for animals such as rats, cats and ferrets. Stoats – introduced in 1884 to combat a rabbit plague – are particularly formidable predators. They can tackle animals 10 times their body weight; they hunt by day as well as at night; they can travel vast distances, climb trees, and survive in almost any habitat. They are also prolific breeders, and they kill far more than they need to satisfy their hunger.

“When stoats get into a seabird colony or chicken hutch, they kill everything,” says Andrew Veale, an expert on stoat genetics at Auckland University. He cites credible reports of a moorhen being attacked by a stoat and taking off into the air, with the stoat still attached. Dr Veale says: “They are phenomenal killers, with an immense bite strength.”

More than 80 of New Zealand’s offshore islands are pest-free sanctuaries where all mammals have been removed through trapping, shooting, and dropping poison from helicopters. Last year, a stoat was found on Rangitoto Island, more than three kilometres off Auckland. The island had been declared predator-free only a year earlier, following a NZ$3m (£1.6m) eradication programme. By analysing the stoat’s DNA, Dr Veale established that it was from the mainland. This year, three stoats have been trapped on Kapiti island, a wildlife reserve 5.2 kilometres off Wellington. Dr Veale believes a female swam over and gave birth.

The destructive potential of stoats is well established. A single male killed 93 petrels on Motuotau island, in the Bay of Plenty, in four weeks. There have been instances of one or two stoats arriving on islands and wiping out entire populations. Philip Bell, a biosecurity officer with the Department of Conservation (DOC), said that if stoats could swim more than five kilometres, “there would be implications for the majority of islands around New Zealand”. He added: “A couple of stoats can create a breeding colony and wipe everything out. Stoats are arguably the biggest threat to our native bird species.”

They are also expensive. DOC has already spent more than NZ$200,000 trapping the three stoats on Kapiti. It will have to monitor hundreds of traps and tracking tunnels on the island for at least two years, as well as using dogs trained to detect stoats. No one is sure what prompts stoats to swim, although they appear to be in search of food. Dr Veale speculates that they take to the water after spotting land on the horizon. With the right tides, they could then travel considerable distances.

New Zealand’s first offshore wildlife refuge was established in 1891, on Resolution Island, off the South Island’s Fiordland coast. A decade later, stoats reached Resolution and killed off its kakapo population. However, more island sanctuaries followed, and kakapo were among the bird species rescued from extinction. Another bird, the Chatham Islands robin, was down to five individuals; but after being transferred to an island, the population recovered.

The stoats and ferrets (which were crossed with European polecats in order to make them more likely to survive in the wild) were introduced to control rabbits.

European rabbits were introduced so that they could be hunted as a game species, but New Zealand’s ecosystem was essentially predator free. Rabbits evolved with heavy predation pressure, and they are the archetypal r-selection species. Whenever one of these species is put into an environment where the pressures that forced them to evolve this reproduction strategy are absent, they very easily begin to overproduce.

However, the logic of introducing stoats or ferret-polecat crosses to control the rabbits appears to have been sound– until one actually applies it.  Rabbits evolves with mustelids attacking them, and they have ways of avoiding predation.  However, the ground-nesting birds of New Zealand evolved with virtually no ground predators, and they have no ways of avoiding mustelid predation.

Stoats and ferret-polecats are intelligent enough to know which species are more easy to hunt, so they go for the ground nesting birds over the rabbits.

So while they do attack and hunt rabbits, they have proved to be much more injurious to native New Zealand birds than to rabbits.

The only way to deal with stoats and ferret-polecats is to kill them.

It can’t be sugar-coated.

Either we cull the invasive species, or the endemic avian fauna of New Zealand is doomed.

But because these are pretty intelligent Carnivorans that are small enough to hide themselves easily, it might be impossible to kill them all.

And those that will remain will be the most wily little things, which will produce offspring that are even more cunning.

Over time, they could become even harder to control.

But even with that possible issue, these animals must be controlled now before the birds become extinct.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Fox and cat cull in Australia

They got only one cat.

These animals do have feelings.

However, they don’t belong on this continent.

The native fauna is ill-prepared to deal with their depredations.

And the only way to save many species of native Australian wildlife is to create areas that are free of foxes and cats.

The only way to do that is to kill them.

They shouldn’t be tortured when they are killed. A single killing shot will do.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Coyotes colonize Fishers Island and hunt cats

From the Suffolk Times:

Ten housecats have gone missing on Fishers Island in the past week, and residents believe coyotes are to blame.

So says island resident Charles Kadushin, whose cat disappeared on Memorial Day and has not been seen since.

Mr. Kadushin said coyotes have been seen all over the island over the past two years and are becoming more prevalent all the time, and some of his neighbors said they can be heard howling along with the fire department’s noon whistle.

“They’re lots of places, in the fort area, they’ve been seen climbing over garden fences,” he said after a special Southold Town Board meeting on Fishers Island Wednesday. “I suppose they’re kind of cute, but they can be dangerous. They attack cats and dogs.”

Mr. Kadushin said that he believes the coyotes are swimming to the island from Connecticut, which has a growing coyote problem of its own.

“They’re known to be very good swimmers,” he said.

Mr. Kadushin said that he’d been keeping an eye out for his cat, but after realizing that other people’s cats have also gone missing “now I know for sure it will never be seen again.”

“All we can do is keep our animals inside,” he said.

Good advice, Mr. Kadushin. Good advice.

Fishers Island is off the coast of Connecticut  on the far eastern end of Long Island Sound. It is not far from the border with Connecticut and Rhode Island, but it is part of New York State. It is administered from Southold, New York, which on Long Island.

The coyotes are apparently swimming to this island from Connecticut, and I seriously doubt that they are finding much natural prey there.

However, like most urban and suburban coyotes, these have improvised their diet to include feral cats and owned cats that happen to be outside.

I bet the birds on Fishers Island are pleased with this development. It has been established that coyotes are a major boon to songbird numbers simply because they prey upon cats.  They don’t have to eat every single cat in region either.  They merely have to scare them so much that they avoid certain areas– which the birds then use as their nesting sites.

Read Full Post »

Mark Derr takes out the cane toad

A cane toad. Look into those eyes. What do you see? Pure evil.

 

Those of you who know me are fully aware that I have always loved Mark Lewis’s Cane Toads: An Unnatural History. The film details the introduction of cane toads to northern Australia to control the cane beetle, which was destroying the country’s sugar industry in the 1930’s, and the subsequent ecological catastrophe that resulted from having vast swarms of poisonous giant toads with rapid reproductive rates and ravenous appetites sweep across the countryside.

I have a copy of this documentary. It is not on DVD or any other newfangled technology. It is on a VHS cassette that was used to tape the film from the Discovery Channel.  In those days, my family taped a lot of television shows in VHS, and in those days, you could buy several blank cassettes that had their own adhesive  labels that could be used to identify the film. With this particular VHS cassette, I could not find the labels, so I was forced to resort to using a band-aid– on which I scribbled the words “Cain Toad.”

Even though I spelled the word incorrectly, I think that this name fits this animal a little better.  Cain was Abel’s murderer, and this toad has been a destructive force where ever it has been introduced.  Not only does it possess a particular toxic venom that is released from two large glands on the back of its head, they are big enough to eat animals that are the size of mouse–which includes many different rare animals that are endemic to various tropical islands and Australia. It kills those who attack it, but it also kills to eat.

I first encountered this species for myself in Hawaii. My family was on vacation on Maui, and we were staying at resort that had extensive landscaping on its grounds.  Because this resort was in the rain shadow of Haleakala, it required some irrigation canals to maintain the veneer of natural lushness. It was dark, and we had just come back from a long day of sight-seeing. As anyone would expect from Americans from the Eastern US in Hawaii, we were jet-lagged and a bit tired.  I was looking forward to a good night’s sleep, but as we crossed the foot bridge over the little irrigation canal, something moved.  The beams from the faux tiki torch landscape lights illuminated the dark water, and as I looked over the edge of the foot bridge, I noticed a tannish yellow blob floating in the black water. My eyes made out the profile of a toad. It was not dissimilar from the American and Fowler’s toads with which I was much more intimately familiar, but it was massive.  To my eye, it was a large as a chihuahua, though this may have been an exaggeration that my imagination has added to it over the years. It took me a few seconds for me to register what this creature was, but it soon hit me:  I was looking at the infamous cane toad, destroyer of ecosystems and invasive species extraordinaire.

I was reminded of this experience when I came across Mark Derr’s piece in today’s New York Times.  Mark Derr lives in southern Florida, where cane toads were also introduced to control pests in the fields of sugar cane. The toads have liked Florida almost as well as they have enjoyed Australia, and they have definitely cause their share of ecological problems.

However, the real issue with cane toads in Florida is the danger the pose to the dogs, which is why he killed a cane toad that had decided to set up residence in his pond.

Derr is not an anti-exotic purist, maintaining non-native plants on his own property and establishing a relationship with an introduced African lungfush, but this toad was a clear and present danger to his dog and other dogs in the neighborhood.

Dogs die from cane toad venom when they put toads in their mouths. Most dogs in my part of the country won’t touch a toad.  That’s because they have been trained by the local Fowler’s and American toads that toads will make your mouth burn. It usually takes just one attempt of a local dog putting a toad in its mouth before it learns very quickly to leave them alone. Of course, the bufotoxin released by an American or Fowler’s toad is not as severe as that released by the cane toad, but in some situations, it is possible for a small dog to die if it ingests toad poison. Larger dogs are usually fine once they have their mouths flushed, and they learn a valuable lesson– leave the toads alone!

Of course, if a dog ingests cane toad venom, it may not get a chance to learn.  Dogs have been known to drop dead within minutes of putting the toad in their mouths.

So it makes sense that one would want to protect “toad naive” dogs from cane toads.

Derr managed to spear the toad with a home-made gig, and the neighborhood dogs were finally safe.

However, removing the toad had several ancillary benefits:

I acted to protect our dog without a thought toward other consequences. But within a week of the Bufo’s death, I began to notice changes in and around the pond. Young and old gambusia [mosquito fish] appeared in significant numbers, swimming freely and openly. I am no expert on Bufo behavior, but this one had an ability to knock down plants growing around its chosen resting spots. Once this Bufo was removed, the pond plants grew lush. Anole lizards, whose absence I had silently noted for some time, became everywhere apparent, and I have begun to hear tree frogs again, as well. Even better, the mosquito population collapsed, leading me to conclude that although the Bufo did not appear to eat the mosquito-loving gambusia, its physical presence had somehow intimidated them and forced them into hiding.

Of course, much of Florida– indeed much of the country– is hardly a balanced ecosystem. The unbalancing of the ecosystems began when Columbus showed up, and we simply cannot go back to the forest primeval of legend, which itself was intensely and artfully managed by various indigenous peoples before the European colonizers came. Humans have been altering the ecosystems for our own benefit in this hemisphere for millennia, and the only thing we can do is preserve what we can.

But cane toads are not nice things to have around.

Even if there were no potential ecological benefits to removing them, it would still be just to kill them– even if killing them really didn’t do much to control their numbers.

I just hope another cane toad doesn’t show up at this pond. However, it is very likely that another one will soon be in residence.

It reminds me of what my grandpa said about people shooting rabbits out of their gardens. Yes, it killed the rabbit, but somehow two or three would come to its funeral.

***

NB:  Here is a good site on first aid if you dog bites any cane toads or any other toads in North America.

 

Read Full Post »

A modest proposal for the free roaming cat mafia

For all you who attack me for not going along with TNR or who get angry at me for even suggesting that cats be kept indoors or within outdoor enclosures, I have a modest proposal.

I suggest that we allow someone who has one of these cats to let his pet roam freely in your neighborhood under the same standards with which you tolerate free-roaming and feral cats:

Like most free roaming and feral domestic cats, it won’t be a skilled predator at first. So it will probably maim and maul a few children and domestic dogs before it becomes truly lethal.

Eventually, the man with the leopard will have his pretty pet leaving human and dog body parts at the door– just to show his owner what a great killer he is!

Scores of children and dogs and probably suburban deer and raccoon will succumb to the great cat.

But because we have the same standard for this free-roaming leopard as free roaming domestic cats, no one can do anything about it.

Now, you know that this scenario is absurd.

But if you really think about it, free roaming cats and ferals are leopards to small birds, mammals, and reptiles.One free-roaming cat could easily do as much damage to those species as our hypothetical free-roaming leopard would do to humans, dogs, and larger wildlife.

And this problem is made worse because it is socially acceptable in too many places to allow cats to roam. Dogs normally are strictly controlled by ordinances. If you can find a nice place that allows dogs some liberty, all power to you. Governments are quite authoritarian about dogs, but cats are essentially ignored.

This makes no sense in terms of ecology. Dogs actually have to learn how to hunt, and they be trained to leave wildlife alone. Cats are instinctive predators, and it is very difficult to teach them anything. The cat family has undergone an evolution toward great jaw strength and muscle mass, while the dog family has undergone an evolution towards greater social intelligence and greater endurance. That’s why dogs are generally less of an ecological problem than one might think– although they certainly are in places like the Galapagos.

In too many parts of the country, cats are deemed domestic animals, even if they cannot be tamed and are breeding freely in the wild. That means that wildlife management agencies have no jurisdiction over them. This legal limbo allows cats to exist in certain areas without ever experiencing the kind of controls that are needed to protect both public health and native wildlife.

So while it would be insane to let someone turn his leopard loose on a neighborhood, we have allowed a leopard of a smaller sort to run amok through our ecosystems for far too long.  To a songbird or rabbit kit, the house cat is a leopard of the fellest kind.

But it is impossible to have a rational discussion about any of this.

Cats are America’s sacred cows.

The evidence is very clear about what sort of ecological damage they do. The level of denialism on that compendium of studies is breathtaking. Only creationists are more brazen in their attacks on what the evidence actually says.

If a individual or firm released a pollutant that sort of damage, you would want fines issued and arrests made. You’d want the firm put out of business.

But cats are cute. CEO’s are not.

Who cares about the facts?

 

 

Read Full Post »

100-pound exotic tortoise discovered in Arizona

 

African spurred tortoises are born only two or three inches long. At maturity, they can weigh 150 pounds.

 

From Mother Nature Network:

Tortoises native to the Arizona desert rarely grow in excess of about 15 pounds, so imagine the surprise of officials with the Arizona Game and Fish Department when they recently came across a huge 100 pound tortoise living comfortably in the Sonoran Desert.

Probably kept as an exotic pet and released into the Arizona wild by its careless handler, the behemoth reptile was an African spurred tortoise, according to Wildlife Extra News.

“Finding an exotic tortoise this size inhabiting the Sonoran Desert is a reminder of how important it is not to release any exotic species into the wild,” said Cristina Jones of the Arizona Game and Fish Department.

Because they are native to the southern edge of the Sahara desert, these giant tortoises are right at home in the similar environment of the Arizona desert. But like many invasive species, their introduction can pose a serious threat to native species.

“Due to their immense size, while defending its territory an African spurred tortoise could easily injure a native desert tortoise,” said Jones.

The African spurred tortoise can grow to a massive 150 pounds, which actually makes it the largest mainland tortoise species in the world. By comparison, Arizona’s principal native species only grows to about 15 pounds, so needless to say, the native species wouldn’t stand a chance in a battle over territory. Furthermore, the African tortoise can radically alter the landscape where it lives. This tortoise had already established itself long enough to build two burrows, including one that was 9 feet deep.

“When people purchase these tortoises they are about the size of a silver dollar, yet they can grow to more than 150 pounds,” Jones said. “These exotic tortoises are long lived and because of their propensity to dig long, deep burrows, they can be extremely difficult to contain.”

Finding just one African spurred tortoise in the Arizona wild might be strange enough, but this was actually the second one found this year. Officials urge that pet owners understand what they are getting themselves into when they purchase an exotic pet, and to always avoid releasing any exotic animal into a non-native habitat.

These spurred tortoises are widely available on the pet market. A simple Google search for available African spurred tortoises reveals a large number of entries– many offering them for less than $100 a piece. I have seen them advertised as sulcata tortoises, which refers to their scientific name (Geochelone sulcata).

That means that it is cheaper to buy a pet African spurred tortoise than most purebred dogs.

Of course, in most of the country, such an animal wouldn’t last very long.

It just in the Sonora Desert that the conditions are right for this particular exotic species.

The Mojave might be similarly hospitable.

They won’t last very long in my part of the country. I can guarantee that.

But in some areas, they could have the potential to be a real invasive species.

I’ve not seen any evidence that they have been breeding in the desert, which is just as well.

They probably nipped this in the bud for now.

 

Read Full Post »

Introduced American mink causing trouble in northern Scotland

(Source for photo).

From the Scotsman:

Aggressive mink have colonised most of the coastline of Skye and Lochalsh posing a risk to ground-nesting birds, according to volunteers carrying out a monitoring project.

Hotspots have been found in Kyle, Kylerhea, Loch Bracadale and North Trotternish as well as the islands in the Sound of Raasay, the Skye and Lochalsh, Environment Forum’s Mink Survey says.

About 50 people have now reported mink sightings, including those that have been trapped, killed on the roads or had footprints recorded in tunnels set with clay pads.

Scores of volunteers, including crofters and members of conservation bodies and fishing organisations, have helped gather the information for the survey, which is funded by Scottish Natural Heritage, the Highland Council and the European Leader programme.

The aim is to develop a policy to help protect native wildlife and biodiversity from the alien species.

Mink were introduced into Britain as a farmed animal for their fur, but escaped, or were released into the wild, where they compete with otters and others of the weasel family. They feed on fish, ground-nesting birds, eggs, and small mammals, and often take poultry from hen houses and runs.

Mammal Society member Roger Cottis welcomed the recent results: “This is an important element in the continuing fight to help indigenous Scottish wildlife under threat.”

A project has been removing mink from the Western Isles for ten years during which time almost 1,500 animals have been cleared from the islands.

I wonder what solutions they will come up with.

I bet they are going to trap and neuter all the wild mink.

And then they’ll feed them so they won’t hunt native birds or mammals.

And then their numbers will drop through attrition.

Actually, we know fully well what they will suggest.

Give me a C. Give me U. Give me an L.  Give me another L.

And no one will say a word about it.

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow