
The first two retriever breeds: the old wavy-coat and the curly.
I know I have written a similar post on the various histories of the golden and flat-coated retrievers, but I think that this history is worth repeating.
The story of retrievers begins with the end of the last vestiges of manorial system in Britain and the Industrial Revolution. Both of these events happened in the late nineteenth century. Theorists have long argued about the causal relationship between the two, but both events complemented each other. Large numbers of people in England were driven out of the countryside during several centuries called “the Enclosure.” These people largely provided the first labor market for the first factories and provided the muscle behind the British navy and private and crown armies.
The technology that had developed as result of the new industrialized production and the opening of new markets as a result of imperialism created great wealth. A whole new class of rich and upper middle class was created. These new rich were deeply influenced with the Romantic movement, which argued that man was happiest in the country “doing country sport.” There were large agricultural lands in Britain that were now overproducing food as result of the agricultural revolution that occurred at roughly the same time. There were far fewer people living in the countryside, because of the centuries of the Enclosure. Thus, there was enough land for these sporting individuals to set up their own shooting preserves, complete with gamekeepers to control game stocks.
Gundogs in Britain evoloved rather peculiarly. In most of Europe, a dog could point, flush, and retrieve, and it would be considered a good dog. In Britain of that day, however, spaniels were used to flush game, and setters and pointers were used as index dogs. This created a division of labor among gundogs.
The idea of a dog for picking up game is not new. The British had always had their rough water dogs and water spaniels for that purpose. However, these dogs were not exactly what the sporting gentleman had in mind. He needed a much faster dog for picking up, and by the early nineteenth century, various dogs began to be used for this work.
The Rev. Thomas Pearce or “Idstone” in his seminal work The Dog (1872) believed that the retrievers evolved from some sort of setter. However, William Nelson Hutchinson’s Dog Breaking (1869) finds that all sorts of breeds were used as retrievers. Idstone does mention that collies and “Newfoundlands” were used in their founding. He also points out that water spaniels played a role in creating the curly-coated retriever. However, Hutchinson is very specific in which breeds made up the main retriever lines of that period.
Hutchinson believes the dogs are derived from the following breeds: the dog on top is a water spaniel/”Newfoundland” cross, the dog on the lower left is a cross between a water spaniel and a setter, and the dogs on the lower left are “Newfoundland”/setter cross. The reason why I put “Newfoundland” in quotations is that this word could mean any sort of water dog from Newfoundland, including the big one. (See this pic of a Landseer Newf retrieving.)
Out of this retriever soup came the foundation of all the modern retrievers developed in Britain. In 1854, the curly-coated retriever was standardized as distinct form. The original curly was a diverse breed, as one could expect from its ancestry in various forms of water spaniel. The early photos of curly show as smaller dog with longer hair than the modern breed. By the late nineteenth century, this breed was bred to be a much larger dog with a very tightly curled coat. One one working strain of curly, the Norfolk, continued on for several years as a distinct breed, but the big curly began to shift from a working dog to fancy show dog. It is the first retriever breed to be standardized by the fancy. It was also the first one to be ruined by it.
By the late nineteenth century, this breed was on its way out as a working dog. It was unknown in retriever trials in early twentieth century, although its cousin, the Norfolk, was still around. It was rapidly being replaced by the other early retriever breed, the old wavy-coated retriever.
Wavy-coats became popular through the exploits of two dogs in early retriever trials, “Old Bounce” and “Young Bounce.” These dogs were very common in Britain, probably because of the use of Welsh black setter in the outcross and the fact that Newfoundland fisherman and hunters often gave away long-haired puppies to British merchants. William Epps Cormack, who once walked across Newfoundland in 1822 wrote that “[t]he smooth or short haired dog is preferred because in frosty weather the long haired kind become encumbered with ice on coming out of the water.” So the long-haired St. John’s water dogs were probably easily procured from Newfoundland, but the smooth-haired ones were very hard to come by. They were simply too economically useful.

Long-haired St. John's water dog.
This breed was prefectly designed for English driven shoots for pheasants and hares. By end of the ninteenth century, this breed replaced the curly as the main working retriever.
I should note here that there were wavies of colors other than black, probably as the result of crossbreeding with setters. Landseer painted a reddish gold retriever named “Breeze”, and Sir Francis Grant’s “Shooting Party-Ranton Abbey” depicts a yellow wavy-coat with some rather unsual ears. Both of these depictions are from the 1840’s. Yellows and reds were always part of the old wavy-coated breed, in part because of the red setters and yellow water spaniels that were crossed into the breed.
These two breeds did have slightly different bloodlines. The curly had a sharper temperament than the old wavy. In the big trials that developed, aggression with other dogs could not be tolerated, so the original curly really had lots of trouble fitting into the new scene.
However, the splitting of the British retrievers into new breeds had only just begun. The Labrador and golden retrievers appear to be absent from this analysis. And what about the Chesapeake Bay retrievers, the Murray River curlies, and Nova Scotia duck tollers? These three breeds are not British, of course, and they developed on a very different trajectory.
I shall continue this analysis in another post to come.
Gosh Golly Darn! Rev Thomas Pearce’s book mentions my breed, but Google Books doesn’t include those pages. Dog poop. I have read Hutchinson, but not Pearce. My two favorites for dog history though are still Gaston Phoebus, Count de Foix ( Le Livre de Chasse) and Edward of Norwich (Master of Game). But that was before setters and retrievers, leaving alaunts, greyhounds of all sizes and types, running hounds ( admix of greys and alaunts), mastiffs and spaniels as the hunting dogs of choice.
I can’t remember whether it’s Hutchinson or Leighton who relegated my breed to be worthy of only tripping daintily over velvet lawns. Guess he never saw one pull a rooster out of the air and shake it do death. While I do value these men as giving a glimpse into the history of dog breeds, I do take what they wrote with a sufficient amount of salt, as they were not without prejudice.
What is your breed?
Hugh Dalziel writes with a great deal of admiration for the curly-coated retriever, while George Teasdale-Buckell hates this breed (he was a flat-coat man). I had to use his work on another forum to explain why the curly lost its popularity (it developed aggression issues and the retriever vice of hard mouth). You would’ve thought I’d said that curlies were out mauling children on the streets. The curly lost its popularity over 100 years ago. It couldn’t compete with the more biddable flat-coat (a descendant of the old wavy-coat), but that dog was also replaced after World War II by the Labrador (which does have old wavy-coat in it) and the golden (the other descendant of the wavy-coat). The old wavy is also one of the main ancestors of the Nova Scotia Duck-tollers, and it was an outcross for the Chesapeake Bay retriever (as was the curly). I’ll get to all of this in a couple of days. I think the old wavy-coat is actually the most important “landrace” retriever, because it has so many descendants.
Those people were horribly biased. Idstone says that retrievers should always be black and that he doubted that the other colors were ever going to be popular or of any use.
I am reluctant to say what it is on a public blog. We are in the midst of a contretemps with a show miller, and the less I say the better.
I have read Dalziel, and I really wish I could keep who said what about which breed straight!
You have it right when you say these men were horribly biased! They had their favorites, and that is very evident when reading their works. However, their books do give us significant clues into the development of the breeds they favored, and shouldn’t be dismissed. Good on you for reading them and using them as references. Few people do pay any attention to Leighton, Dalziel or Hutchinson today, and there is much to be learned from them!
I had not heard of Leighton until you mentioned it. I’m amazed at what I’m reading about the bulldog. That breed has been screwy for a very long time.
[…] This post is a continuation of this earlier one. […]