• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Patreon
  • Premium Membership
  • Services

Natural History

by Scottie Westfall

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« This is not a golden retriever from working lines
What’s my favorite dog book? »

Selective breeding has also dramatically changed the goldfish

February 19, 2009 by SWestfall3

This is a feral goldfish caught in the US. It strongly resembles its ancestor, the Prussian carp.

This is a feral goldfish caught in the US. It strongly resembles its ancestor, the Prussian carp.

It is often pointed out how much domestication and selective breeding have changed the domestic dog.  But they are far from the only species in which our selective breeding has changed dramatically. Dogs have been with us for a very long time, and because of tandem repeats, they can evolve into various different forms rather quickly.

However, if you would like to see another species that has dramatically changed because of domestication, look no further than the goldfish. Goldfish are species of carp, and believe it or not, there are two wild subspecies of this carp that still exist in the wild. These are the Prussian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) and the Crucian carp (Carassius auratus carassius). These fish can all produce fertile offspring with the goldfish, and the Crucian carp is known to come in a yellow mutation. It was thought that the goldfish descended from the Crucian subspecies, when now it is generally accepted that it descends from the Prussian subspecies.

Prussian carp

Prussian carp

crucian-carp

Over a thousand years ago, the Chinese were breeding carp in ponds. Some of these fish were yellow in color, a common mutation in carp.

yellow-crucian

A yellow Crucian carp.

In 1162, an Empress of the Song Dynasty had a pond constructed solely for yellow and reddish fish. Yellow fish were the sole domain of the imperial family, so the gold colored were bred more often. As a result, the main color of the domesticated goldfish would become gold, not yellow.

Within a 150 years, the Chinese began to breed veil-tailed varieties of the fish, and soon, goldfish began to change dramatically.

This fancy breeding happened in East Asia first, but it soon spread to Japan, where the fancy breeding really took off.

My favorite type of Japanese goldfish is the ranchu. The ranchu has a large head with an arched back that dips down before it reaches its tail. And, like many fancy goldfish, it has two tails. On its head, it has lots of growths that are considered absolutely necessary for its breed standard. It also has no dorsal fin.

ranchu

The ranchu, like most double-tailed “fancy” goldfish, cannot really live in a pond as its less exaggerated relatives can. The double tail and unstreamlined body prevent these fancy goldfish from swimming fast. They need to swim fast if they are to be pond fish, because they will be unable to compete with faster swimming goldfish in their school. Also, these fish have lost their ancestors’ tolerance for very cold water.

However, I would not count the ranchu as the most bizarrely exaggerated goldfish. That title goes to the bubble-eye.

bubble-eye

The bubble eye also has no dorsal fin. It has a double-tail, which does slow the fish down. But its most striking feature are the fluid filled sacks that come off the bottom of its eyes. It cannot ever be pond fish or ever kept with fast moving goldfish. Those sacks and the double tail make it really slow in the water. It is very hard to keep in a fish tank, because the chances are very high that it might damage its eye sacks. I once purchased one of these and it lasted about a week in my goldfish tank. I had a common feeder-type goldfish in that same tank that lasted several years, so that should tell you which races of goldfish are the hardiest.

So our selective breeding has not changed only dogs. We like to really mess around with selective breeding, and if we can find novelty in our stock, we’ll breed for it. It is because of this almost inherited tendency in our species that we must draw the line at some point. Interest in novelty of all sorts may have been a great advantage for our species, allowing us to develop all sorts of new technology and art, but like everything else, our tendency to select for novelty can be excessive.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Crucian carp, domestication, goldfish, Prussian carp | 5 Comments

5 Responses

  1. on February 19, 2009 at 5:21 pm YesBiscuit!

    And in the case of some breeds of dog, the excessive selection for novelty has made finding a sound, healthy representative of that breed a novelty in and of itself!


  2. on February 19, 2009 at 11:35 pm ms ann thrope

    “And in the case of some breeds of dog, the excessive selection for novelty has made finding a sound, healthy representative of that breed a novelty in and of itself!”

    How true, how painfully true! And no, those fancy goldfish would only survive in a covered pond. Any self respecting Great Blue heron would wipe out the breeding stock in a few gulps otherwise.
    What is interesting is that basic goldfish if released into the wild will revert. There is a small quarry not far from me with a captive collection of goldfish/carp that were released there about 25 years ago. It’s deep enough the fish can bury in the sediment to survive the winter. The original fish were all store bought goldfish. Now, there are are fish whose phenotype looks pure carp, and all combinations in between.
    Now, if only dog breeders would start selecting for larger muzzles, less domed skulls, less dwarfism, shorter backs,less coat, less bulk and return to the type of an earlier age, a lot of today’s novelties would be so much better off!


    • on February 20, 2009 at 12:34 am retrieverman

      I’ve caught wild goldfish in the rivers in West Virginia, and almost none of them are gold. They are like that feral specimen.

      It’s kind of like how dogs would eventually either evolve into the typcial street dog or a dingo-like animal if left to their own devices. And the availability of carrion or garbage is the factor that determines what type evolves. However, there have been no dingoes evolving from domestic dogs in modern history. We are that dirty.


    • on February 20, 2009 at 12:37 am retrieverman

      The problem with fancy goldfish is that they might do okay in a pond in temperate conditions, like in North Carolina or the South of England. However, if they are housed with single-tailed races that are stream-lined, like common goldfish or comets, they can’t eat enough food to thrive. The faster ones simply swim and eat all the food before the slow-movers can get to it.


  3. on February 20, 2009 at 6:57 am Pai

    Mmm… one of my favorite computers games growing up was a simulation for breeding fish. Shows what a huge geek I am. It was actually quite versatile for it’s time, and it was fascinating to see how selective breeding could get some extreme results.

    I think some breeders would actually be better off playing simulation games like that and not messing with live animals at all.



Comments are closed.

  • Like on Facebook

    The Retriever, Dog, and Wildlife Blog

    Promote Your Page Too
  • Blog Stats

    • 9,600,271 hits
  • Retrieverman’s Twitter

    • 2 people followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 20 hours ago
    • @TetZoo I am unfamiliar with any wild canid with those markings. Unless they are German shepherds, specifically tho… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
    • @cyborgsuzy I hated all my time in the DC area. Same reason. Toxic culture. Makes you feel like you're in some kin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 6 days ago
    • @TetZoo That was the proto QAnon conspiracy theory. Wow. America is sending out lots of toxic slime conspiracy theo… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
    • @cyborgsuzy Sounds like it would work. In theory.... 2 weeks ago
  • Google rank

    Check Google Page Rank
  • Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
  • Recent Comments

    markgelbart on Retiring this Space
    oneforestfragment on Retiring this Space
    The Evolving Natural… on So does the maned wolf break t…
    SWestfall3 on So does the maned wolf break t…
    Ole Possum on So does the maned wolf break t…
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,703 other followers

  • Pages

    • About
    • Contact
    • Patreon
    • Premium Membership
    • Services
  • Subscribe to Retrieverman's Weblog by Email
  • Revolver map

    Map

  • Top Posts

    • Newfoundlands were not always giants
  • SiteCounter

    wordpress analytics
    View My Stats
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,703 other followers

  • Donate to this blog

  • Top 50 Northwest Dog Blogs

    top 50 dog blogs

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel

 
Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    %d bloggers like this: