• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Patreon
  • Premium Membership
  • Services

Natural History

by Scottie Westfall

Feeds:
« Previous Post
The paranoid rantings of the president of the Pekingese Club of America »

“Bulldogs haven’t changed very much!”

March 11, 2012 by SWestfall3

So says the Team Jenneh “We Was Robbed” Facebook Group. 

I’m gonna have to call BULLSHIT on that one! Yeah, bulldog bullshit. It’s not what happens when you cross one with a shih-tzu.

It was well known 10o years ago that bulldogs were radically different from what they once were. This painting by Cresswell H. Desmond from The Twentieth Century Dog Vol. I by Herbert Compton.  The image comes from the 1904 edition. What does the symbolism of this painting suggest?

(Source for image.)

The “Old Order” is the long-legged, long tailed bulldog, and the “New Order” is the squat monstrosity of canine flesh that is the modern bulldog.

This image denotes change in type.

I don’t have to show you more images. I could go through Stonehenge’s work and show you all the old-type bulldogs.  I could dig up bulldog paintings of yore.

I could do all of that.

And the Team Jenneh acolytes would still parrot the line about bulldogs always being like this. I’ve actually been through that Robert Leighton book, and he doesn’t say that bulldogs are fine. Quite the opposite. In fact, the Leighton book just shows how long bulldogs been unusually delicate animals. Puppies died all the time. Bitches had trouble whelping. If only bulldogs had only those problems to worry about today!

The Team Jenneh folks are looking like a bunch of spoiled children who just got their dessert taken away from dinner.

When I was a kid and got in trouble for that sort of thing, we got put on the chair and told “Shamey, shamey!”

Well, here’s your “shamey, shamey”  for acting like a bunch of spoiled brats.

Your dog didn’t pass a health exam that you knew it would have to face if it won BOB.

It didn’t.

The ref called a foul.

Get over it!

See related post:

  • The bulldog and Peke people are not amused.

Posted in dog breeding | Tagged bulldog, pekingese, Team Jenny, Team Jenny Forever | 20 Comments

20 Responses

  1. on March 11, 2012 at 10:55 pm sameykamp

    That picture shows a much longer legged bulldog with more nose & no extreme skin fold above his nose, sure it’s still not quite what I’d like to see in a Bulldog but it’s no where near as extreme as what we are seeing today. That type of Bulldog even had problem back then as stated & instead of improving upon the breed as all these show breeders are forever parroting on about they have just compounded upon many of the health issues. They already had problems & along with that they are guilty of adding a few newer & more servere ones while they where at it.
    Give me an Aussy or American plain legger type Bulldog any day over one of their deformed dewarfed waddling blue tongued(lack of oxygen) show & pure breed Bulldogs. They are making a fool of themselves & would do better spending as much time & energy on figuring out how to save their breed & start producing dogs that can have normal active long lives.


    • on March 11, 2012 at 10:57 pm retrieverman

      But it’s so much easier to get on Facebook and complain. And create conspiracy theories.


  2. on March 11, 2012 at 11:48 pm EmilyS

    completely and totally absurd. The bulldog was one of the dogs most often painted in the pre-modern era so we have very clear ideas of what it actually looked like. It was a leggy dog.. and you don’t even see any underbite till late 1890’s. This is as much bullshit as the notion that bullbaiting dogs had their noses on top of their snouts so they could breathe when they had their jaws clamped on the bull’s nose, illustrated by absurd drawings of modern bulldogs bullbaiting.


    • on March 12, 2012 at 3:01 am Pai

      It’s obvious that ‘Team Jenny’ has not even read the book that they’re linking to, since the pictures in the book illustrate rather clearly how much the breed has changed since it was written.

      Compare the proportions of the show Bulldogs in the book to the modern type. They have less wrinkles, more nose, less bone/fat, longer legs (though often severely elbowed out), a more normal-shaped body, and smaller heads often as well… in terms of ‘typey features’ they are clearly Bulldogs, and are really an illustration of how selecting for the constant exaggeration of those features have shaped the modern version of the breed. All anyone has to do is Google ‘Champion Bulldog’ and start comparing photographs, it’s not hard!


  3. on March 12, 2012 at 2:37 am Pai

    Photograph of a Champion Bulldog, 1879:

    The fact that even in the face of reams of photgraphic and textual evidence from the early 19th Century that contradicts their claims, they still persist in saying the modern Bulldog is -not- an extreme caricature of what it originally was? It’s delusion on a massive scale.


  4. on March 12, 2012 at 11:32 am Ray Lane

    Actually, the Bulldog is a concocted breed type – a lighter Mastiff that came in various shapes and sizes. The name Bulldog was concocted in England long after King Philip of Spain had opened trade with England. There is no history of the light type mastiffs in England in the Middle Ages in the Pits/Arenas. The light type Mastiffs were used during the American Conquests (as space on ships was limited) where they were found rather useful – even in a small package. As a standard, the APBT or American Staffordshire Terrier should represent the “Bulldog Proper,” as it is higher on leg than the English Staffs. These are the most capable of round ups and catching cattle today. The larger Bulldogs often called American Bulldogs are better suited to guard duty.


    • on March 12, 2012 at 2:30 pm EmilyS

      no, the APBT and SBT are bulldog AND terrier mixes, one of several concocted in the mid nineteenth century. It is an absolute ahistorical error to ask them to represent a bulldog. The American bulldog has NO terrier component.


      • on March 13, 2012 at 11:13 am NotAWolf

        As retrieverman noted, most breed histories are bullshit.

        If you think the American Bulldog has no terrier component, you are deluding yourself with the same type of racial purity thinking that has destroyed pedigree dogs.


        • on March 16, 2012 at 3:06 pm Ray Lane

          Yes, I would agree with the lack of any real purity of any breed, most especially the Bull/Mastiff breeds. The very test of gameness in the APBT seperates the Bulldogs from the Curs. Still, even in the best of breedings, curs will still be thrownback. However, the Bull/Mastiffs have never been a breed per say, and this is often overlooked as a breed type according to funtion, (as a Pointer Points, A Retriver Retrives) a Bull/Mastiff is a Fighting Dog. Let us look at how concocted the history (especially written in English) really is….

          “The Staffordshire Bull Terrier had its beginnings in England many centuries ago when the Bulldog and Mastiff were closely linked. Bullbaiting and bearbaiting in the Elizabethan era produced large dogs for these sports and later on the 100-120 pound animal gave way to a small, more agile breed up to 90lbs.”
          AKC
          What changed in England at this time was the introduction of the war dogs used in the Conquests of the Americas (including South USA) by King Philip ll of Spain who open trade from 1556 to 1649. Many of these war dogs were the size and type of a Bulldog (Alano/Lebrel – not Bull/Terrier) like Becerrillo who was a small stocky dog. For all intents, the Bulldogs existed in America before the English subvariant.
          Some have questioned the existence of this type dog of today, but consider that bull and bear baiting has been replaced by pig baiting. And, Mastiff sized Bulldogs of up to about 120lbs are still used or abused in this bloodsport.


      • on March 16, 2012 at 2:50 pm Ray Lane

        I would challenge you to prove that without any DNA to back up such a theory. When we read books by Wynn of 1886, he writes of all types of crossbreeding of Bull/Mastiffs – except for Terrier. So where does the story of Terrier crosses actually start? While I’ve read a number of books, I have yet to find any before the turn of the century (about 1898 when the UKC started the breed APBT) that even mention Terrier crosses – except for the EBT. Moreover, when I was a child, the American Bulldog did not exist as a breed. As I was taught (by folks much older than JDJ and Alan Scott) any farmer wishing to register his Bulldog, may do so as APBT and earn the honerary title Pit – the hard way.


  5. on March 12, 2012 at 1:07 pm Ray Lane

    Calling a “Bulldog” a breed, is like calling a Retriver a breed. A Bulldog is simply a smaller type Alano best suited to round ups which can require catching. The term Alano is neither a breed.


  6. on March 12, 2012 at 1:09 pm Mary

    I find it interesting that the white dog in that painting actually looks a lot like a modern American Bull Dog.


    • on March 12, 2012 at 4:27 pm massugu

      That’s no coincidence Mary. The ABD is probably the closest contemporary analog you’ll find to the OEBD.


    • on March 16, 2012 at 3:09 pm Ray Lane

      Actually, it reminds me of an English Bulldog cross. This look comes from the Pug and other Chinese crosses that has led these show type Bulldogs to lose much of their working ability.


      • on March 16, 2012 at 4:12 pm Ray Lane

        In fact, as a few already know, I breed a breed known as White English which predates the American Bulldog. We freely admit, this breed is not English, but derived mainly from Spain with other crosses over the centuries in South USA and is (if registered so) the same breed as APBT (as was Tates Dutches Lady) and even the American Bulldog and Alapaha (as all my stock came from Pastoralits from the 90 mile area of the Alapha River Region. Here is another breed started by Mr Altman of Waycross GA, who very honestly used the breed White English as an outcross to the English Bulldog to create his breed – the Altman White English – which appears much closer to the dog above.

        http://altmanwhiteenglshbulldogs.com/


  7. on March 13, 2012 at 3:37 am Peter Lundin

    The Bulldog Breed Council has put out a press release
    http://www.bulldogbreedcouncil.co.uk/
    PL


  8. on March 13, 2012 at 10:01 am A little something from Pai « The Retriever, Dog, & Wildlife Blog

    […] The irony, of course, is that the Team Jenny (We was robbed!) Facebook group suggested this book as evidence that bulldogs haven’t changed at all. […]


  9. on March 14, 2012 at 4:56 pm Peter Lundin

    Note that there is no id number in the vet certificate!
    PL


  10. on March 16, 2012 at 4:24 pm Ray Lane

    “…..by crossing a White English Bulldog with AKC Bulldog…” Thus, we see, these are two seperate breeds. Sadly, the name White English is defined differently according to the breeder and breed club, and is no better defined than the American Bulldog in public circles. Few realize, the ancient use of Mastiffs was to guard the cattle (livestock) of the wolf and brought by the various barbarian nomadic tribes of warriors – also used in warfare. The first major importation into South USA, was by Spain. JDJ of the American Bulldog Club history only told of the English moving into South USA about 1733, and leaves out they went their to drive out the Spanish hold of nearly 200 yrs priror.


  11. on March 19, 2012 at 1:26 pm Ray Lane

    The American Bulldog History is well documented in saying the breed arrived from England in 1733 in the area of Savanna GA. But, let’s look at the English Bulldog of 1733…

    “Much can happen to change a breed of a dog in fifty years and by inbreeding and breeding with a fixed purpose in view, between the tears of 1686 and 1735, a dog of definate type and of an average weight of 50 to 60lbs, was produced.”
    Our Dogs, Voss, 1933

    The American Bulldog’s average size is 60 to 120lbs, that being far too large to be a Bulldog, but more of a Mastiff.



Comments are closed.

  • Like on Facebook

    The Retriever, Dog, and Wildlife Blog

    Promote Your Page Too
  • Blog Stats

    • 9,401,416 hits
  • Retrieverman’s Twitter

    • Just the Good Ol’@Boy retrieverman.net/2020/09/25/jus… 23 hours ago
    • 2 people unfollowed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 2 days ago
    • Chicken study complicates brain size and domestication assumptions retrieverman.net/2020/09/23/chi… 3 days ago
    • Bulldog History III: The Bulldogs of Northwestern Europe retrieverman.net/2020/09/22/bul… 4 days ago
    • one person followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 5 days ago
  • Google rank

    Check Google Page Rank
  • Archives

    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
  • Recent Comments

    Pai on Just the Good Ol’ B…
    The Evolving Natural… on So does the maned wolf break t…
    SWestfall3 on So does the maned wolf break t…
    Ole Possum on So does the maned wolf break t…
    kuymal on The Thylacine was more a marsu…
  • Meta

    • WordPress.com
  • Pages

    • About
    • Contact
    • Patreon
    • Premium Membership
    • Services
  • Subscribe to Retrieverman's Weblog by Email
  • Revolver map

    Map

  • Top Posts

    • Black and tan golden retriever/Labrador cross
  • SiteCounter


  • Donate to this blog

  • Top 50 Northwest Dog Blogs

    top 50 dog blogs

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


%d bloggers like this: