• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Patreon
  • Premium Membership
  • Services

Natural History

by Scottie Westfall

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Black squirrel in the snow
Fisher vs. gray fox »

The foundations are on shaky ground

March 10, 2015 by SWestfall3

Photo by Marlies Kloet

Photo by Marlies Kloet

On the Pedigree Dogs Exposed Facebook group, debate is very common, and things have heated up in the aftermath of Crufts.  So many controversies are going on with Crufts this year, but one of them that has me curious is one involving the issue of breed standards.

Last week, rancorous debate ensued when it was suggested that the golden retriever that won the breed at Crufts was overweight. I don’t have an opinion about the weight of the dog, but I was curious about why golden retrievers in Europe are so divided between show and working types.

The answer I was given was that golden retrievers in Europe were just pets, and it didn’t matter if they were built for the purpose or not.

Earlier I had posted an image of a golden retriever winner at Crufts in 1927, and I asked why they were okay with breed changing so much.

The answer I received was that the breed should just be allowed to evolve.

Both of these answers are problematic.

Everyone who gets interested in dogs learns that dog shows and breed standards were developed to preserve the breed, but if conformation is allowed to slide just because the dogs aren’t used anymore or are allowed to “evolve” based upon fashion, then how can anyone say that dog shows have anything to do with preserving the breed?

I got no answers to that question.

This evening things have taken an even more bizarre turn when the issues turned to those surrounding the tendency to breed for extreme type in conformation with dogues de Bordeaux. On my group, it was asked why dogues de Bordeaux were being bred to look like giant red English bulldogs, and it just so happens that we have video of the author of the FCI standard for that breed excoriating breeders for producing such extreme dogs.

So if the even ideas of the people who helped standardize the breed don’t matter, then the entire edifice of the dog show is pretty tenuous.

It ultimately comes down to people will breed whatever they like, just so long as the judges award them with prizes. Judging requires understanding the standard, but much of the standard is like scripture– quite open to interpretation.

If all it comes down to is what wins in the ring, then this appears to be one of the worst ways of selecting breeding stock. Breed type and what wins in the ring become self-fulfilling prophecies rather than objective ways of evaluating dogs.

I assumed that some of this was going on all along, but I did not expect it be articulated to me in such a way.

It is rather quite distressing.

And yes, people do use golden retrievers in Europe, but it is now all but impossible to have a dual purpose dog in the breed now.

And people still do breed dogues de Bordeaux that look and move soundly.

It is just that dog shows and breed standards aren’t what they are portrayed to be. They are not the final word on a dog’s quality.

I think it may be long past time for the pretense to be dropped entirely.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in dog breeding, golden retriever | Tagged breed standards, dogue de bordeaux, golden retriever | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on March 10, 2015 at 9:40 pm Marg

    I must admit hearing about the poisoning of the Crufts dogs upset me quite a bit as it brought back awful memories of one our pointers who was poisoned (he also was a multi show winner as well as being field winner). The dog died a slow and miserable death, but he was our family dog as well as a fantastic hunting dog. It came down to someone poisoning him because they were jealous.


  2. on March 10, 2015 at 10:29 pm M.R.S.

    The answers to the problems posed are somewhat complex, but primary is the fact that as new people come into a breed, they lack the background and experience to really understand what the breed was intended to be. Successive generations of newcomers select for what they consider attractive’ with lless understanding of what is “normal’ –usually each edging closer to the extreme with each generation of fanciers. Temple Grandin calls it “the radicalization of inexperience”, the “bad becoming normal”.

    As to Golden Retrievers, In the UK the standard has undergone numerous changes over the years; some minor, some major. Any reference to weight or to proportion was removed around 1986. There are others reasons for these problems as well,; too much to get into here. But it should be said, that a judge can only judge what is in the ring: if the exhibitors don’t bring the right sort of dogs, the judge must make do with what is there.


  3. on March 11, 2015 at 12:06 am cyborgsuzy

    Dog show culture is toxic. How do you reason with people who think it’s normal and OK for “experts” to spread false information about breed history, health, and other basic facts?


  4. on March 11, 2015 at 1:39 am nickelsmum

    Must the judge make do with what is there? If judges had the cojones to refuse to put up a winner at times, it would certainly help a great deal.


  5. on March 11, 2015 at 5:24 am dorothea penizek

    Did it take you until now to realise that?


  6. on March 11, 2015 at 6:45 am UrbanCollieChick

    Even inexperienced people could easily look at dogs of the past as a guide. There are loads of references in books and video. If it’s about inexperience, at what point did the first goldens start to slowly change? Wouldn’t the new potential breeders have the current goldens of their day to breed from? Those redder, leaner fit dogs with legs?

    I always wonder about those first moments when the scales tipped for breeds. When did someone first see a slightly flatter face on a dog and decide that was okay? When were the first show dogs slighly more teddy bearish deemed okay? And so on?


  7. on March 11, 2015 at 9:27 am M.R.S.

    How do things get changed, how do dog breeds “evolve”? Remember that old game of “Telephone”, where a message whispered through a series of people becomes something else entirely at the end? That’s one way– each person hears or interprets or transmits the message a little differently. And the differences add up. Then there is the fact that it seems to be human nature for each breeder to put their own stamp on “their line” of dogs, to have something distinctive– whether it is historically appropriate or not

    Add all that to a breed becoming highly popular for reasons other than its original purpose, becoming a product for the pet market– all sorts of unfortunate things can happen.

    As far as “experts”, well, that’s a whole ‘nother discussion.


  8. on March 11, 2015 at 11:46 am Shirley Adams

    Depressing, but I was happy to see the gun dog exhibit. I hope for a dual champion in the U.S., there are breeders actively breeding for this goal. I believe that a golden should be an active to moderately active (not active like as GSP) dog, with a good on-off switch. That’s the family for which a Golden is suited. And that’s for a pet Golden. They shouldn’t be bred for a sedentary, TV-watching, video game playing type, nor sold to them.


  9. on March 12, 2015 at 11:30 am Footwear

    Crufts has really gone down Hill – too much interchange with dogs now for reasons that shouldn’t be allowed.


  10. on March 13, 2015 at 6:05 am Jen Robinson

    The behavioral ramifications of show selection are as reprehensible as the physical ramifications. Svartberg (2006) after crunching the numbers on >13,000 behavioral assessments of Swedish pedigree dogs, concluded: “Selection towards use in dog shows correlates positively with social and nonsocial fearfulness, and negatively with playfulness, curiosity and aggressiveness, whereas selection towards use in Working dog trials is positively correlated with playfulness and aggressiveness. ” (Not his definition of aggression is more assertiveness than likeliness to bite). See: http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/group/AnimPersInst/Animal%20Personality%20PDFs/S/Sa-Sc/Svartburg%202006.pdf



Comments are closed.

  • Like on Facebook

    The Retriever, Dog, and Wildlife Blog

    Promote Your Page Too
  • Blog Stats

    • 9,552,002 hits
  • Retrieverman’s Twitter

    • retrievermanii.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-la… https://t.co/su6REHh0jV 2 days ago
    • @Fiorella_im Seder = Democrats' George Costanza. The Jerk Store called. They don't want him returned. 2 days ago
    • one person unfollowed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 2 days ago
    • @Fiorella_im @MagnusPanvidya @theconvocouch How many liberals and TYT-type Youtuberati are you going to piss off tonight? 3 days ago
    • one person unfollowed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 5 days ago
  • Google rank

    Check Google Page Rank
  • Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
  • Recent Comments

    markgelbart on Retiring this Space
    oneforestfragment on Retiring this Space
    The Evolving Natural… on So does the maned wolf break t…
    SWestfall3 on So does the maned wolf break t…
    Ole Possum on So does the maned wolf break t…
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,701 other followers

  • Pages

    • About
    • Contact
    • Patreon
    • Premium Membership
    • Services
  • Subscribe to Retrieverman's Weblog by Email
  • Revolver map

    Map

  • Top Posts

    • Coyote tracks in the snow
  • SiteCounter

    wordpress analytics
    View My Stats
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,701 other followers

  • Donate to this blog

  • Top 50 Northwest Dog Blogs

    top 50 dog blogs

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: