• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Patreon
  • Premium Membership
  • Services

Natural History

by Scottie Westfall

Feeds:
« Shadow
Major historical discovery »

A remarkable Labrador retriever

February 3, 2011 by SWestfall3

The dog in the photo above is Dual Ch. Bramshaw Ben. Not only was he a British field trial champion, but he won Best in Show at Crufts in 1932 and 1933.

He was owned by Countess Lorna Katherine Curzon Howe. She was a notable Labrador retriever authority and enthusiast, who was instrumental in introducing the Labrador retriever to the United States.

Countess Lorna Howe was also instrumental in founding the specialist club for Labrador retrievers in the UK. Although the Labrador was recognized as a breed in the Kennel Club in 1903, it did not have a specialist club until 1916.

Countess Howe’s book on Labradors can be found (1981 edition).

Ben is very close in appearance to the British working type Labrador we see today.  I should note that both show and working-type Labradors have diverged a bit from the original form, with many show-type Labradors developing along the lines of black Angus bulls and many working-type dogs possessing rather light frames.

Bramshaw Ben lived at time when the Labrador retriever was becoming truly established in the UK trial scene. Although he lived during the height of the Great Depression, people with means and access to land for shooting were starting to consider Labradors for their “pick-up” work.

The first decades of the twentieth century were the Halcyon Days of the flat-coated retriever. In 1900, if you said the word “retriever,” the average person wold think of a long-haired black dog. After the First World War, the flat-coat fell from favor. Many reasons have been posited for this drop in popularity, but it is likely that a combination of factors led to the flat-coat losing its position as the main retrieving breed used on shooting estates.

Among these is the gradual improvement of the Labrador. George Teasdale-Buckell wrote of the Labrador in 1907:

When Mr. Holland Hibbert ran Munden Single, the Labrador, in the 1904 retriever trials, there is not much doubt she would have been high up in the prize list had it not been that the last runner she got was brought back dead. It was a wing-tipped cock pheasant that Single roded out and then chased. But the cock could almost beat the dog by the help of its wings, and no doubt the Labrador was pretty much blown when she got hold. Then she had to cross a brook to get back, and it is likely enough that a stumble, or perhaps jumping against the bank, led to the pinching of the bird. However, excuses are not admitted in public competitions, and indeed none was made. In 1905, Single appeared to be quite tender in the mouth, and although she is admirably broken, and has no excitement or nervousness, but lots of love of the game, she was not as fortunate in her opportunities as had been the case the year before, and got no prize for work although she has lots of merit. Another Labrador at this meeting got a certificate of merit, so that, as only three entries have been made all told at retriever trials, the breed has taken a much better position with spectators than is indicated by its want of success in gaining stake money

—The Complete English Shot (pg. 194).

Teasdale-Buckell was a total flat-coat man, so his views were not unbiased. However, there may be some truth to what he was saying. Flat-coats would continue to dominate the British retriever scene until the First World War. Labradors were simply not the first choice.

However, the Labrador was being carefully selected for its working ability. St. John’s water dogs were imported to add new blood to the strain, and the dogs were crossbred with flat-coats. I cannot find any evidence of Labradors being crossbred with dogs that make up the foundational stock to the golden retriever, but it is possible that some crosses with these dogs happened.

And through that breeding and careful selection, the Labrador became a good working breed.

However, there was often a complaint of the Labrador being a bit ugly. Harding Cox denounced the Labrador “less beautiful and more obstinate” than the noble Flat-coat.

But with an attractive Labrador winning Crufts two years in a row, that complaint could no longer be considered valid. They now worked well and were pretty.

The Labrador has continued to grow in popularity as a working breed. It is the retriever in Britain– and the rest of the world. It is most popular dog in the US and the UK, and it very well may be the most popular dog breed in the world right now.

However, because the breed is so numerous and used for so many purposes, it has evolved in so many directions.  It is almost impossible to find a true dual purpose Labrador anywhere, and it would be next to impossible to find a field champion Labrador in the UK that is also a Crufts contender.

Bramshaw Ben was truly remarkable dog, who did much to credit his breed in the eyes of retriever enthusiasts. Today, we cannot imagine a time when Labradors were not the most popular dogs. But as recently as 90 years ago, they were playing second fiddle to the flat-coat, a breed that too many people today would misidentify as a “black golden retriever.”

Times change, and with them, go the fortunes of breeds. In 1900, no one would have thought the Labrador would be the main retrieving breed. The flat-coat’s position seemed set and secure.

Perhaps someday we’ll see the Labrador retriever lose its position as the most-esteemed retriever in the same way the flat-coat did. And who knows which obscure breed might take its place?

Tollers?

Boykins?

Only time will tell.

Maybe the Lab is built to last.

But history shows that no breed has a permanent monopoly on its status.

They can fall just as easily as they can rise.

Posted in Labrador retriever, Retriever history, St. John's Water Dog, working dogs, working retrievers | Tagged Bramshaw Ben, Countess Lorna Howe, Labrador retriever | 6 Comments

6 Responses

  1. on February 4, 2011 at 4:46 pm M.R.S.

    I have copy of a pedigree of one of the very early yellow Labradors, showing some common ancestry with Goldens. This pedigree was researched by Dorothy Howe (USA, no relation that I know of to Lorna, Countess Howe).

    Except for the not-very-well posed hindquarters, that photo of B. Ben is an excellent example of a classic Labrador.


    • on February 4, 2011 at 5:08 pm retrieverman

      Jack van der Wyk’s site mentions a litter in which half some were short-haired and registered a labs and half were registered as goldens.

      Two well known Chesapeake Bay retrievers were a dog called Jolly, who sired the male Labrador retriever Jolly Sam, born before 1933, and the bitch Corydalys, who was the dam of the female Labrador retriever Micklefield Juno, born before 1925. Clyde, born before 1923, was the “liver” (chocolate) Flatcoat retriever who sired the male yellow Labrador FTW Folkingham Bexter (1925), who in turn sired the yellow bitch FTW Limekiln Rhoda (1927). She and the yellow dog FTW Golden Morn (1926) had a litter that was registered as “half Golden Retriever and half Labradors”. The separation was by coat length, because all puppies were yellow. Apparently the third generation showed some traits of the original breed involved.

      http://www.labradornet.com/typecast.html


  2. on February 4, 2011 at 6:20 pm JR

    My what a beautiful black lab! Got to love them! They are definitely one of our favorite breeds.


  3. on February 18, 2011 at 8:22 am Maria Bring

    Thank you for including your sources!


  4. on March 18, 2011 at 3:45 am gareth johnston

    Interesting article. I’d love to see a lab winning Crufts again… they really are the sweetest dogs…. but the article is interesting in the light of a 9 year old flat coat winning Crufts Best in Show this year!!

    Perhaps that will see a revival of the Flat Coat?

    However, I think not. What is interesting is when the ‘cross breeds’ make it into Crufts, since doesn’t the labradoodle or Golden Doodle have all the advantages of a lab or golden retriever, but without the disadavantages (for a house pet?).

    I see many labradoodles, and think this is the breed that will eventually take over top spot from a lab. They’re lovely dogs….they are sweet, energetic, and don’t shed hair all over the house!!… but you cannot beat that gorgeous labrador look in my opinion. Its no wonder that labs are currently top dogs.


  5. on February 16, 2013 at 9:27 am The breed is evolving. Good or Bad? - Page 4

    […] in 1932 and 1933. This article is also interesting. Look at how much bench dogs have changed. A remarkable Labrador retriever Wildlife Blog Reply With […]



Comments are closed.

  • Like on Facebook

    The Retriever, Dog, and Wildlife Blog

    Promote Your Page Too
  • Blog Stats

    • 9,604,279 hits
  • Retrieverman’s Twitter

    • one person followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 1 day ago
    • 2 people followed me // automatically checked by fllwrs.com 4 days ago
    • @TetZoo I am unfamiliar with any wild canid with those markings. Unless they are German shepherds, specifically tho… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 6 days ago
    • @cyborgsuzy I hated all my time in the DC area. Same reason. Toxic culture. Makes you feel like you're in some kin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
    • @TetZoo That was the proto QAnon conspiracy theory. Wow. America is sending out lots of toxic slime conspiracy theo… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 weeks ago
  • Google rank

    Check Google Page Rank
  • Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
  • Recent Comments

    markgelbart on Retiring this Space
    oneforestfragment on Retiring this Space
    The Evolving Natural… on So does the maned wolf break t…
    SWestfall3 on So does the maned wolf break t…
    Ole Possum on So does the maned wolf break t…
  • Meta

    • WordPress.com
  • Pages

    • About
    • Contact
    • Patreon
    • Premium Membership
    • Services
  • Subscribe to Retrieverman's Weblog by Email
  • Revolver map

    Map

  • Top Posts

    • The wolf's only major natural predator
  • SiteCounter


  • Donate to this blog

  • Top 50 Northwest Dog Blogs

    top 50 dog blogs

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Loading Comments...
Comment
    ×
    %d bloggers like this: