Reeves’s muntjac is native to China and Taiwan. It is not native any place in Europe, but one of the places where it has been introduced is England. The epicenter of their population in that country is Bedfordshire, where this hunt takes place. The Dukes of Bedford were into promoting deer on their estate, Woburn Abbey, and they were instrumental in saving the Pere David’s deer from extinction. One suggestion is that the muntjac in England derived from Reeves’s muntjac that escaped Woburn Abbey, but they also could have derived from escapees from the Whipsnade Zoo.
Whatever their origin, Reeves’s muntjac have established themselves a long way from their native territory, and they do quite a bit of damage to trees.
And what usually happens is that people are encouraged to hunt the invasives, but as you can see from the selective shooting that goes on this video, the species is now being managed as a sort of game species on many estates. This development should be of no surprise, and it should be noted that island of Great Britain has only two native deer species, the red and the roe. The very common fallow deer was introduced by the Romans and then again the Normans from the European continent.
But the fallow deer is essentially managed as a native game species. The exact same thing is done with Sika deer that have been introduced to Maryland. White-tailed deer are treated the same way in the Czech Republic, as are all the deer that have been introduced to New Zealand.
Whatever their treatment as a game or invasive species, this video does provide a nice closeup of the male Reeves’s muntjac as a specimen. Of particular note are the tusks, which they use for fighting and display. It is mentioned in this clip that they are “musk deer, ” but this is in error.
This error comes from the tusks that both muntjac and musk deer possess, but musk deer are placed in their own family (Moschidae). True deer are Cervidae, and all the muntjac species are true deer that fall into the Cervinae subfamily (which includes red deer, fallow deer, and North American elk). However, they are primitive Cervinae.
Musk deer differ in some morphological characters from true deer in that they don’t have facial glands, possess only a single pair of teats, and have a gallbladder. They also never have antlers, and all species possess a scent gland on their tail.
The common ancestor of musk and true deer, though, had prominent tusks. The modern muntjac species is unique in that it still has those fangs of the earliest Cervinae.
The other true deer that is known for its tusks is the Asian water deer, which was definitely introduced to Britain thanks to escapees from Woburn Abbey. But it is not closely related to the muntjac at all.
It is also not a musk deer, even though it has much more prominent tusks than the muntjac and never has antlers. Instead, it fits within Capreolinae, the subfamily of deer that includes roe deer, moose, reindeer/caribou, and all the New World deer but the wapiti. Its prominent tusks and lack of antlers are a also primitive trait in this lineage of deer.
That muntjac and water deer are both fanged shows that more primitive animals will resemble each other more the derived forms of their respective lineages.
These cnine teeth are celebrated in North America elk lore. Their “ivory” is taken as almost as much a trophy as the antlers, and indigenous people in Canada and the US used them as jewelry. They aren’t sharp daggers like those found on muntjac and water deer, though. They are just vestigial teeth that show that the ancestor of the great bugling bull were once little fanged creatures.
These upper canines also appear in white-tailed deer on occasion as an atavism.
Beyond these little fangs, North American deer lack these primitive traits, so I find fangs on these Asian species totally fascinating.
They are windows into the past, when deer were just little beasts of the undergrowth.
Just like people in Europe manage fallow deer as game species, people in the US manage feral hogs as a game species. Why don’t people manage mongooses, Asian carp, and Burmese pythons as game species when that would be more ecologically sustainable than eradicating them from the introduced area? Eradicating introduced species often involves using toxins, pesticides, and herbicides, which have long term negative effects on the environment.
I bet that house mice and brown rats could be treated as game species very sustainably. That, along with eating grass fed cattle and goats, pastured chickens, pigs, and turkeys, and eating edible insects and arachnids, would be much more sustainable for the environment than eating factory farmed cattle, pigs, chickens, and turkeys.
If there is really is an overpopulation issue with Near Eastern Wildcats (called feral cats), why don’t we make feral cats (not housecats, stray cats, indoor-outdoor cats, and barn cats), as well as feral pigeons (not pet pigeons) and mustangs (feral horses) a regulated game species like feral hogs (not pet pigs)? Hunting them for food would be reducing or preventing overpopulation without the disruption of endocrine systems and causing of surgical complications (surgical suture breakages), long term negative health (obesity, diabetes, increased appetite, slowed metabolism, FLUTD, urinary blockages), and behavioral (depression, lethargy, lessened activity level) effects that spaying and castrating (neutering) causes.
There is a fellow named Sam Wood in Wisconsin who suggested that people do that very thing. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/02/23/this-hunter-waged-a-war-on-feral-cats-now-he-says-he-has-become-the-target-of-attacks/?utm_term=.dec4e7e9a256
BUT the haunting would be regulated, the hunt would be fair (no canned hunts) the species would not be expirated from the area.
I love and respect cats. I personally wouldn’t hunt a single cat, be it lion, tiger, cougar, bobcat (the red lynx), serval, caracal, margay, chaus (the jungle cat), jaguar, jaguarundi, manul, leopard, leopard cat, flat headed cat, black footed cat, rusty spotted cat, pampas cat, ocelot, fishing cat, cheetah, or wildcat (of which feral cats, barn cats, and housecats belong to the lybica subspecies and Scottish wildcats belong to the silvestris subspecies).
I mentioned spaying and neutering as not exactly being fair because some of the effects thereof may make feral, free roaming, and any other cat outside of indoor-only cats easier targets to their predators, coyotes. I personally call this the “Canned Hunting Effect,” because the prey are made easier in some way or another for the predator or hunter to take down, catch, or shoot. Well, the gonadectomy surgeries decrease metabolism, which cause obesity and depression, sometimes severe, incurable forms, and make many cats less active and some even lethargic. The procedures also have complications and the TNR organizations may not give them enough or long enough post operative care or may “return” them too early. The “trap” and “neuter” parts also lower the trust level or destroy what little trust these cats have for humans, so they may end up even less adoptable than before. Not exactly what you want if you are trying to keep EVERY cat in this country indoors, which is an unrealistic goal to be having.
Reasons Why Keeping Every Cat Permanently Indoors is Unrealistic
1) Indoor-only cats are deprived of the fresh air the outdoors provides (even outdoors in smoggy cities is better air quality than indoors). You can open windows to allow fresh air in but that is not as much fresh air as actually being outdoors
2) Cats accustomed to being allowed to be outdoors would have a hard time staying indoors permanently
3) Being permanently indoors increases the risk of hyperthyroidism and obesity
Trump banned trophy hunting of elephants. Way to go, Trump! You can’t trophy hunt elephants sustainably, elephants are endangered.
I personally solve this problem by never owning cats. LOL.