Archive for the ‘Wisconsin’ Category

Mark Derr lays out the case that they aren’t as different as people try to make them.

There is a certain nuttiness that tends to pop up with both wolves and dogs.

We know that there are lots of crazy dog people.

But when we start talking about wolves, three quarters of the population falls into either pathological wolf-haters or wolfaboos.

It’s very likely that we were once very much into wolves. We probably encouraged them to live near us, and eventually, we included them in our hunts.

I agree very much with Mark Derr that the big dividing line between wolves and dogs and between people and wolves happened when we began to keep sheep and goats as livestock.

If a wolf, even one living in the camp, killed a sheep, it would be killed or driven off.

So dogs are largely descended from wolves that could learn to live with sheep and goats, and modern wolves are descended from those who could not or never were selected for tolerance toward those species in the first place.


Read Full Post »

They had to rename it last night.

Forgive my liberalism.


Read Full Post »

This cat was killed in 1984 in Marinette County, Wisconsin, which is “up Nort’.”  This cat weighed 48.9 pounds.

That’s the largest official record for a bobcat, but there have always been unconfirmed claims of bobcats weighing as much as 60 or even 70 pounds, which is close to the size of the Eurasian lynx. I don’t automatically reject these claims, but I am very skeptical of them. It is possible that there were very large bobcats at one time, and these were killed off as European settlers moved in. However, they were not weighed and fully documented, so we don’t know if these claims are true.

Without this important documentation, we have to accept that the largest bobcat on record was this Wisconsin bobcat.

Bobcats vary greatly in size. 12 or 13 pound queens are not unusual in much of their range. It is only in the northern parts of their range where the toms get so large. These largest bobcats actually weigh more than the Canada lynx, which does not have such wide variances in size.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

The American water spaniel is the state dog of Wisconsin.

The water spaniel family is but a tiny vestige of what it once was.

Before the retriever became the predominant water dog of the English-speaking world, there were water spaniels and water dogs.

In Britain and Ireland, several different types evolved. The most ancient of which is the so-called English rough water dog, which we would nicely put. in to the poodle/barbet family.  George Stubbs painted “water spaniels” that were more of this rough water dog type in the eighteenth century.

These dogs were clearly of the poodle-type, but in various parts of England, various sorts of land spaniel were crossed in. These were the first “doodles,” if you will.

As anyone who has bred goldendoodle to goldendoodle or cock-a-poo to cock-a-poo knows, there is always a chance of producing a dog that has more of the retriever-type coat.

And very often this coat is wavier than one would find on a normal cocker or golden.

It is from dogs of this breeding that the water spaniel breeds evolved.

Unlike the retrievers that came later, the water dogs and water spaniels were often owned by commoners. The dogs were very good at hauling and setting nets. They could also be of some use for poachers and market hunters.

Because they were so common among commoners, different regional strains appeared. There were northern and southern Irish water spaniels. There was water spaniel or water dog from Northumberland and the Scottish Borders that was commonly tawny or yellow in color, which we know to be an ancestor of the golden retriever and may be a source for the yellow Labrador.

And along the east coast of England, there was a liver water spaniel. It was particularly common in the county of Norfolk, where it became known as the Norfolk retriever in its later years. From its description in Hugh Dalziel’s British Dog, it sounds more like a water spaniel than retriever:

The colour is more often brown than black, and the shade of brown rather light than dark – a sort of sandy brown, in fact. Coat curly, of course, and the curls hardly so close and crisp as in the show retriever of the present day, but inclined to be open and woolly. The coat is not long, however, and across the back there is often a saddle of straight short hair. In texture the coat is inclined to be coarse, and it almost invariably looks rusty and feels harsh to the touch. This, however, may in some measure be due to neglect. The head is heavy and wise-looking, the muzzle square and broad; ears large, and somewhat thickly covered with long curly hair. The limbs stout and strong, with large and well-webbed feet. The tail is usually docked like a spaniel’s, but not so short. This seems to be quite a keeper’s custom, and probably originated from the fact that, to an inexperienced eye, the tail of a puppy generally appears too long for the dog. However, although docking the tail improves the appearance of a spaniel, in my opinion it completely spoils the symmetry of a retriever.

I have previously pointed this dog out to fanciers of the Murray River curly-coated retriever, which itself heavily derived from water spaniel lineage. The more typical curly is blend of the St. John’s water dog-type and the water spaniel.

But the Murray River curly and the dog that is the main focus of this post look very similar to each other.

It was not just in Australia that the liver water spaniel made its mark.

In America, the water spaniel was quite common through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. George Washington owned a water spaniel, which may have been either this sort of dog or one of the Irish varieties. Much to Washington’s chagrin, the dog mated with one of his foxhound bitches. (I’m sure the puppies were drowned.)

In the early days of retrievers in the US, water spaniels made up most of the dogs registered. These were mostly Irish water spaniels, for that breed was one of the first  the AKC recognized.

By the beginning of the twentieth century, however, the  retriever was coming into the fore. In Britain, the retriever had nearly supplanted all water spaniel breeds, and in America, the Chesapeake ducking dog, as it was known, had started to get some good press.  Among the most loved of Teddy Roosevelt’s dogs was a Chesapeake named Sailor, who kept the peace among his motley crew of hunting dogs and pets.

The water spaniel’s days were numbered.

However, Australia was not the only place to still hold some of this old strain.

In the Midwestern US, water spaniels were quite common.

In the Fox River and Wolf River Valleys of Wisconsin, these dogs were often seen working as retrievers from canoes. Their smaller size made them quite useful in this task, one that they share with the canoe dogs of the certain Northeastern tribes and the canoe Labradors. Smaller dogs just don’t take up that much space.

The market hunters of that region had a lot of use for such dogs.  Killing birds to feed patrons at fancy restaurants had become a nineteenth and early twentieth century obsession. Everyone with money wanted to eat wild game. This same market currently exists in Africa where it is called the “bushmeat trade.” However, middle and upper class Americans from this time period were really the people who invented it. It was just that much more thrilling to eat a Canada goose than a domestic greylag.

But the market hunters and the dogs that helped them were never recognized.

The AKC had recognized the Chesapeake– a dog that market hunters held very dear.  It was also a retriever, and retrievers were thought as the cutting edge of dogs.

Water spaniels were so yesterday.

So it wasn’t until the 1920’s that anyone tried to do anything with the water spaniels.

A man by the name Doc Pfeifer of New London, Wisconsin, is credited with getting the breed recognized. But for his efforts, it is likely that the native water spaniel of the region would have disappeared.

For in those days, the retriever was being heavily promoted. The whole notion of the retriever had been imported from Britain, and the British had seen off its main water spaniel breeds. Only the now very rare Norfolk retriever and the McCarthy’s strain of the southern Irish water spaniel existed. The various English water spaniel strains and the Tweed variety had since disappeared or had been made part of the retriever breeds.

Such would have been the fate of this water spaniel.

But to have this breed recognized as something truly American– well, that could save it.

It had a brief spate of popularity in the 1920’s and 1930s. Then, its population crashed.

And that’s where it has been ever since.

In 1985, it was made the state dog of Wisconsin. As far as I know, it’s the only dog breed to have originated there.

The liver water spaniel was once a fixture along the British coast. It disappeared from its original range, but in two very different places, dogs of this type have been preserved.

One of them is the curly-coated retriever that was developed along the Murray River system of New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia.

The other was in Wisconsin.

The only other dog of this type is the Boykin spaniel of South Carolina. It likely has American water spaniel heritage.

Both the AWS and the Boykin can be used as flushing spaniels.

Along with the Irish water spaniel, these dogs are the last survivors of what was once a very diverse group of dogs.

It’s a shame that these dogs exist only a relics, for two hundred years ago, these animals were quite common.

Such is the fate of dog breeds.


When I used to have a Clustermap on this site, I noticed that a big red dots were covering three or four Midwestern states. Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa were a major source of hits I was receiving.

I am surprised, then, that I have received not a single request to write about this dog.

I did not even realize I was neglecting it until a few weeks ago.

I didn’t write about it, largely because I know more about the Murray River curly and the Irish water spaniel than this breed.

So if anyone who is more expert about this breed would like to inform me more about it, I would be very happy for your input.

Read Full Post »

I am a sculptor by trade, but am wholly consumed by dogs and the outdoors.

Wilderness time with the dogs is a necessity to me, not a luxury.

I go stir-crazy indoors. My list of favorite places in the Midwest is quite long, but I am particularly fond of the Lower Wisconsin State Riverway in Southwest Wisconsin. I’ve been there more than anywhere else.

My ‘trail dogs,’ as I affectionately call them, get the benefit of many dog sport activities through our time outside. I believe that camping/adventures with dogs utilize the best of agility, obedience, and other breed group type trials.

I do not micromanage the dogs.

But I am not a ‘set it and forget it’ owner in that we continually use these outdoor opportunities to develop our bonds.

And last but not least, a curious nature combined with a liberal arts education has left me a quasi-philosopher so you must prepare for lots of questions. I never stop asking, even it is tiresome, or so my family would say.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: